Literature DB >> 24570153

Toward the interpretation of the combined effect of size and body weight on the tribological performance of total knee prostheses.

Santina Battaglia1, Paola Taddei, Silvia Tozzi, Alessandra Sudanese, Saverio Affatato.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The research questions of the present study were: (1) Is total knee prosthesis wear behaviour influenced by implant size, body weight and their combined effect? (2) Are these findings significant and helpful from a clinical point of view?
METHODS: Two very different sizes of the same total knee prosthesis (TKP), previously tested with ISO 14243 parameters, were tested on a knee simulator for a further two million cycles using a modified ISO 14243 load waveform. Roughness examination was performed on the metallic components. Gravimetric and micro-Raman spectroscopic analyses were carried out on the polyethylene inserts.
RESULTS: The average volumetric mass loss was 69 ± 3 mm(3) and 88 ± 4 mm(3) for smaller and bigger size, respectively. Bigger TKPs are little influenced by an increased load, while the wear trend of the smaller TKP showed a redoubled slope, and more significant morphology changes were observed. However, the two sizes seem to behave similarly when subjected to a load increase of 15 %; the slope of the volumetric mass loss trend was comparable for the two sets of inserts, which did not appear significantly different also at the molecular level. Roughness average parameters of the lateral femoral condyle support this evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: It can be asserted that the body weight and implant size are relevant to the understanding of TKP wear behaviour. A post-implantation body weight increase in a patient with smaller knee dimensions could results in more critical effects on prosthesis long-term performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570153      PMCID: PMC4037527          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2297-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  31 in total

1.  The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs during functional activity.

Authors:  J D DesJardins; P S Walker; H Haider; J Perry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Mobile or fixed unicompartmental knee prostheses? In-vitro wear assessments to solve this dilemma.

Authors:  P Taddei; E Modena; Thomas M Grupp; Saverio Affatato
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-06-26

3.  The predictive power of surface profile parameters on the amount of wear measured in vitro on metal-on-polyethylene artificial hip joints.

Authors:  S Affatato; G Bersaglia; Yin Junqiang; F Traina; A Toni; M Viceconti
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  A new method of in vitro wear assessment of the UHMWPE tibial insert in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Saverio Affatato; Luca Cristofolini; Walter Leardini; Paolo Erani; Mara Zavalloni; Domenico Tigani; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.094

5.  Unicompartmental knee prostheses: in vitro wear assessment of the menisci tibial insert after two different fixation methods.

Authors:  S Affatato; M Spinelli; M Zavalloni; S Carmignato; N Lopomo; M Marcacci; M Viceconti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The Mark Coventry Award: in vivo knee forces during recreation and exercise after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Nikolai Steklov; Shantanu Patil; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement.

Authors:  D L Bartel; V L Bicknell; T M Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The influence of the implant size on the outcome of unconstrained total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Pellengahr; P E Müller; H R Dürr; M Maier; C Birkenmaier; F Mazoochian; M Pfahler; H Troillier; A Lienemann; V Jansson
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.090

9.  Tibial high-density polyethylene wear in conforming tibiofemoral prostheses.

Authors:  P Plante-Bordeneuve; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-07

10.  Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiung Huang; Jiann-Jong Liau; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  4 in total

1.  In vitro effects on mobile polyethylene insert under highly demanding daily activities: stair climbing.

Authors:  Sami Abdel Jaber; Paola Taddei; Silvia Tozzi; Alessandra Sudanese; Saverio Affatato
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Early changes in serum osteocalcin and body weight are predictive of implant fixation in a rat model of implant loosening.

Authors:  Brittany M Wilson; Meghan M Moran; Matthew J Meagher; Ryan D Ross; Maleeha Mashiatulla; Amarjit S Virdi; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Analysis of Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Hinge Mechanism Articulation Components in a Rotating Hinge Knee Design: A Comparison of In Vitro and Retrieval Findings.

Authors:  Ronja A Schierjott; Alexander Giurea; Hans-Joachim Neuhaus; Jens Schwiesau; Andreas M Pfaff; Sandra Utzschneider; Gianluca Tozzi; Thomas M Grupp
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Quantification of Wear and Deformation in Different Configurations of Polyethylene Acetabular Cups Using Micro X-ray Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Saverio Affatato; Filippo Zanini; Simone Carmignato
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.