Literature DB >> 2455550

Gap junction structures. VIII. Membrane cross-sections.

G E Sosinsky1, J C Jésior, D L Caspar, D A Goodenough.   

Abstract

Profiles of negatively stained gap junctions have been measured by grid sectioning. After normal levels of electron irradiation, the membrane thickness shrinks to about half that of unirradiated controls, but no shrinkage occurs in the hexagonal lattice plane. Even under low irradiation conditions, there is significant thinning of the membranes. Edge views, in which rows of connexons are aligned parallel to the beam, were obtained from grid sections, folds in normal negatively stained specimens, and sections of a positively stained specimen. Averaging these micrographs with the translational and mirror symmetry of the projected lattice image displays conserved and variable features in the stain distribution of different specimens. Variations in the relative amount of negative stain in the gap at the surfaces and in the channel are uncorrelated with the irradiation but appear to depend on the local staining conditions and the integrity of the connexons. The dimensions measured from previously unirradiated grid sections, folds, and positively stained sections are in accord with x-ray diffraction measurements. Radiation-induced shrinkage can be accounted for by mass loss principally from the membrane bilayer. Disordering of the surface structure appears to be correlated with the radiation sensitivity of the bilayer; in contrast, the gap structure is well preserved under a variety of conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2455550      PMCID: PMC1330249          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83152-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  25 in total

1.  Beef liver catalase structure: interpretation of electron micrographs.

Authors:  P N Unwin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-10-15       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Electron microscopy of the stacked disk aggregate of tobacco mosaic virus protein. II. The influence of electron irradiation of the stain distribution.

Authors:  P N Unwin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1974-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Specimen damage caused by the beam of the transmission electron microscope, a correlative reconsideration.

Authors:  K Stenn; G F Bahr
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1970-06

4.  Comparative mass measurement of biological macromolecules by scanning transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  R Freeman; K R Leonard
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 5.  Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel.

Authors:  W R Loewenstein
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Three-dimensional reconstruction from tilted sections of fish muscle M-band.

Authors:  P K Luther; R A Crowther
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Feb 9-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Two configurations of a channel-forming membrane protein.

Authors:  P N Unwin; P D Ennis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Feb 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A new approach for the visualization of molecular arrangement in biological micro-crystals.

Authors:  J C Jésior
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Gap junction structures. V. Structural chemistry inferred from X-ray diffraction measurements on sucrose accessibility and trypsin susceptibility.

Authors:  L Makowski; D L Caspar; W C Phillips; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-04-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Gap junction structures. IV. Asymmetric features revealed by low-irradiation microscopy.

Authors:  T S Baker; D L Caspar; C J Hollingshead; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

1.  Conformational changes in surface structures of isolated connexin 26 gap junctions.

Authors:  Daniel J Müller; Galen M Hand; Andreas Engel; Gina E Sosinsky
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Correlation analysis of gap junction lattice images.

Authors:  G E Sosinsky; T S Baker; D L Caspar; D A Goodenough
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Molecular organization of gap junction membrane channels.

Authors:  G E Sosinsky
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 4.  Connexin family of gap junction proteins.

Authors:  E C Beyer; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Diffraction diagnosis of protein folding in gap junction connexons.

Authors:  T T Tibbitts; D L Caspar; W C Phillips; D A Goodenough
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Three-dimensional structure of the gap junction connexon.

Authors:  G Perkins; D Goodenough; G Sosinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Preparation, characterization, and structure of half gap junctional layers split with urea and EGTA.

Authors:  S Ghoshroy; D A Goodenough; G E Sosinsky
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Structure of the extracellular surface of the gap junction by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  J H Hoh; G E Sosinsky; J P Revel; P K Hansma
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Conservation of a cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal domain of connexin 43, a gap junctional protein, in mammal heart and brain.

Authors:  A el Aoumari; C Fromaget; E Dupont; H Reggio; P Durbec; J P Briand; K Böller; B Kreitman; D Gros
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 10.  A structural and functional comparison of gap junction channels composed of connexins and innexins.

Authors:  I Martha Skerrett; Jamal B Williams
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.964

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.