Literature DB >> 2160297

Diffraction diagnosis of protein folding in gap junction connexons.

T T Tibbitts1, D L Caspar, W C Phillips, D A Goodenough.   

Abstract

To diagnose the regular polypeptide conformation in gap junction membranes, the x-ray intensities diffracted from oriented specimens have been separated into a modulated component due to the coherently ordered portion of the channel-forming pairs of connexon hexamers and a diffuse component due to the disordered parts. The spherically averaged ordered protein diffraction, in the resolution range 15-4 A, was compared with intensity curves calculated from the Fourier transforms of proteins representative of the major tertiary structural classes. From this comparison the alpha-helical content of the ordered portion of the connexon was estimated to be approximately 60%. Calculation of cylindrically averaged patterns for oriented distributions of alpha-helical and beta-sheet proteins demonstrated that the ratio of the modulated diffracted intensity near 5 A spacing on the meridian and 10 A spacing on the equator observed from the gap junctions can be accounted for by alpha-helical segments inclined relative to the connexon axis. Model dimers of connexonlike hexamers were constructed from alpha-helix bundle proteins to correlate features in the calculated diffraction patterns with the model parameters. On the basis of these correlations, the ordered gap junction diffraction data indicate that alpha-helical segments centered at 38 A from the midplane of the gap have a mean radial location approximately 24 A from the hexamer axis, and an axial projected length of approximately 35 A. Thus, these alpha-helical segments traverse the hydrocarbon core of the lipid bilayer, as expected for the four hydrophobic sequences of the connexin molecule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2160297      PMCID: PMC1280808          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82621-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  40 in total

1.  X-ray scattering by some native and denatured proteins in the solid state.

Authors:  D P RILEY; U W ARNDT
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1953-03-11

2.  Atomic coordinates and structure factors for two helical configurations of polypeptide chains.

Authors:  L PAULING; R B COREY
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains.

Authors:  L PAULING; R B COREY
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Three dimensional fourier synthesis of horse deoxyhaemoglobin at 2.8 Angstrom units resolution.

Authors:  W Bolton; M F Perutz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Two configurations of a channel-forming membrane protein.

Authors:  P N Unwin; P D Ennis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Feb 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure.

Authors:  J S Richardson
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1981

7.  Gap junction structures. V. Structural chemistry inferred from X-ray diffraction measurements on sucrose accessibility and trypsin susceptibility.

Authors:  L Makowski; D L Caspar; W C Phillips; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-04-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Crystal structure analyses of reduced (CuI) poplar plastocyanin at six pH values.

Authors:  J M Guss; P R Harrowell; M Murata; V A Norris; H C Freeman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-11-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver.

Authors:  E C Beyer; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junction protein.

Authors:  D L Paul
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  12 in total

1.  Correlation to protein conformation of Wide-angle X-ray Scatter parameters.

Authors:  Wael M Elshemey; Abdo A Elfiky; Wissam A Gawad
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 2.  Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions.

Authors:  Shoji Maeda; Tomitake Tsukihara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Gap junction channel structure in the early 21st century: facts and fantasies.

Authors:  Mark Yeager; Andrew L Harris
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 4.  Gap junctions.

Authors:  Morten Schak Nielsen; Lene Nygaard Axelsen; Paul L Sorgen; Vandana Verma; Mario Delmar; Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 5.  Molecular organization of gap junction membrane channels.

Authors:  G E Sosinsky
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Three-dimensional structure of the gap junction connexon.

Authors:  G Perkins; D Goodenough; G Sosinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Self-assembly of membrane junctions.

Authors:  R Bruinsma; M Goulian; P Pincus
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Altered formation of hemichannels and gap junction channels caused by C-terminal connexin-32 mutations.

Authors:  C Castro; J M Gómez-Hernandez; K Silander; L C Barrio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Water structure in cubic insulin crystals.

Authors:  J Badger; D L Caspar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A helical-dipole model describes the single-channel current rectification of an uncharged peptide ion channel.

Authors:  P K Kienker; W F DeGrado; J D Lear
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.