Literature DB >> 6716484

Gap junction structures. V. Structural chemistry inferred from X-ray diffraction measurements on sucrose accessibility and trypsin susceptibility.

L Makowski, D L Caspar, W C Phillips, D A Goodenough.   

Abstract

X-ray diffraction patterns have been recorded from partially oriented specimens of gap junctions isolated from mouse liver and suspended in sucrose solutions of different concentration and thus of different electron density. Analysis of these diffraction patterns has shown that sucrose is excluded from the 6-fold rotation axis of the junction lattice for a length of about 100 A. This indicates that the aqueous channel of the junctions is in the closed, high resistance state in these preparations. Mapping of the sucrose-accessible space in the junction indicates that the cross-sectional area of the channel entrance on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane could be up to five times larger than the area of the transmembrane channel. Sucrose does not penetrate more than 20 A into the membrane along the channel. Apparently the aqueous channel, 8 to 10 A in radius for most of its length, is narrowed or blocked by a small feature about 50 A from the center of the gap. Very close interactions exist between the gap junction protein and the lipid polar head groups on the cytoplasmic surface of the membrane. In this region, the protein intercalates between the polar head groups. These results suggest that the gap junction protein may have a functional two-domain structure. One domain, with a molecular weight of about 15,000, spans one bilayer and half of the gap and is contained largely within a radius of 25 A from the 6-fold axis. The second domain is smaller and occupies the cytoplasmic surface of the gap junction membrane. Trypsin digestion removes about 4000 Mr from the cytoplasmic surface domain of the junction protein. Most of the material susceptible to trypsin digestion is located more than 28 A from the 6-fold axis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6716484     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90331-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  17 in total

1.  Different ionic selectivities for connexins 26 and 32 produce rectifying gap junction channels.

Authors:  T M Suchyna; J M Nitsche; M Chilton; A L Harris; R D Veenstra; B J Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Structural analysis of mitochondrial pores.

Authors:  C A Mannella
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1990-02-15

Review 3.  Gap junctions.

Authors:  Morten Schak Nielsen; Lene Nygaard Axelsen; Paul L Sorgen; Vandana Verma; Mario Delmar; Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.090

4.  Gap junction structures. VII. Analysis of connexon images obtained with cationic and anionic negative stains.

Authors:  T S Baker; G E Sosinsky; D L Caspar; C Gall; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Molecular organization of gap junction membrane channels.

Authors:  G E Sosinsky
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 6.  Connexin family of gap junction proteins.

Authors:  E C Beyer; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Diffraction diagnosis of protein folding in gap junction connexons.

Authors:  T T Tibbitts; D L Caspar; W C Phillips; D A Goodenough
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Gap junction structures. VIII. Membrane cross-sections.

Authors:  G E Sosinsky; J C Jésior; D L Caspar; D A Goodenough
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  How electrolyte shielding influences the electrical potential in transmembrane ion channels.

Authors:  P C Jordan; R J Bacquet; J A McCammon; P Tran
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Monovalent ion selectivity sequences of the rat connexin43 gap junction channel.

Authors:  H Z Wang; R D Veenstra
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.