Literature DB >> 23701448

Risks to biodiversity from hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shales.

Erik Kiviat1.   

Abstract

High-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing (HVHHF) for mining natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica shales is widespread in Pennsylvania and potentially throughout approximately 280,000 km(2) of the Appalachian Basin. Physical and chemical impacts of HVHHF include pollution by toxic synthetic chemicals, salt, and radionuclides, landscape fragmentation by wellpads, pipelines, and roads, alteration of stream and wetland hydrology, and increased truck traffic. Despite concerns about human health, there has been little study of the impacts on habitats and biota. Taxa and guilds potentially sensitive to HVHHF impacts include freshwater organisms (e.g., brook trout, freshwater mussels), fragmentation-sensitive biota (e.g., forest-interior breeding birds, forest orchids), and species with restricted geographic ranges (e.g., Wehrle's salamander, tongue-tied minnow). Impacts are potentially serious due to the rapid development of HVHHF over a large region.
© 2013 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23701448     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  7 in total

1.  Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.

Authors:  Austin W Milt; Tamara Gagnolet; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Impacts from above-ground activities in the eagle ford shale play on landscapes and hydrologic flows, La Salle County, Texas.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Charles J Abolt; Michael H Young
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.

Authors:  Alexandre Racicot; Véronique Babin-Roussel; Jean-François Dauphinais; Jean-Sébastien Joly; Pascal Noël; Claude Lavoie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Comparison of Recent Oil and Gas, Wind Energy, and Other Anthropogenic Landscape Alteration Factors in Texas Through 2014.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Brad D Wolaver; Benjamin J Labay; Travis J LaDuc; Charles M Duran; Wade A Ryberg; Toby J Hibbitts; John R Andrews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The association of unconventional natural gas development with diagnosis and treatment of internalizing disorders among adolescents in Pennsylvania using electronic health records.

Authors:  Irena Gorski-Steiner; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Heather E Volk; Sean O'Dell; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 8.431

7.  Impact of shale gas development on water resources: a case study in northern poland.

Authors:  Ine Vandecasteele; Inés Marí Rivero; Serenella Sala; Claudia Baranzelli; Ricardo Barranco; Okke Batelaan; Carlo Lavalle
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.266

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.