Literature DB >> 22447181

Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: a potential outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians.

P J Drohan1, M Brittingham, J Bishop, K Yoder.   

Abstract

Worldwide shale-gas development has the potential to cause substantial landscape disturbance. The northeastern U.S., specifically the Allegheny Plateau in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky, is experiencing rapid exploration. Using Pennsylvania as a proxy for regional development across the Plateau, we examine land cover change due to shale-gas exploration, with emphasis on forest fragmentation. Pennsylvania's shale-gas development is greatest on private land, and is dominated by pads with 1-2 wells; less than 10 % of pads have five wells or more. Approximately 45-62 % of pads occur on agricultural land and 38-54 % in forest land (many in core forest on private land). Development of permits granted as of June 3, 2011, would convert at least 644-1072 ha of agricultural land and 536-894 ha of forest land. Agricultural land conversion suggests that drilling is somewhat competing with food production. Accounting for existing pads and development of all permits would result in at least 649 km of new road, which, along with pipelines, would fragment forest cover. The Susquehanna River basin (feeding the Chesapeake Bay), is most developed, with 885 pads (26 % in core forest); permit data suggests the basin will experience continued heavy development. The intensity of core forest disturbance, where many headwater streams occur, suggests that such streams should become a focus of aquatic monitoring. Given the intense development on private lands, we believe a regional strategy is needed to help guide infrastructure development, so that habitat loss, farmland conversion, and the risk to waterways are better managed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22447181     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9841-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  2 in total

1.  Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds.

Authors:  S K Robinson; F R Thompson; T M Donovan; D R Whitehead; J Faaborg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.266

  2 in total
  17 in total

1.  Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.

Authors:  Austin W Milt; Tamara Gagnolet; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Impacts from above-ground activities in the eagle ford shale play on landscapes and hydrologic flows, La Salle County, Texas.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Charles J Abolt; Michael H Young
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Habitat loss and modification due to gas development in the Fayetteville shale.

Authors:  Matthew D Moran; A Brandon Cox; Rachel L Wells; Chloe C Benichou; Maureen R McClung
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.

Authors:  Alexandre Racicot; Véronique Babin-Roussel; Jean-François Dauphinais; Jean-Sébastien Joly; Pascal Noël; Claude Lavoie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Fracked ecology: Response of aquatic trophic structure and mercury biomagnification dynamics in the Marcellus Shale Formation.

Authors:  Christopher James Grant; Allison K Lutz; Aaron D Kulig; Mitchell R Stanton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Time Series Analysis of Energy Production and Associated Landscape Fragmentation in the Eagle Ford Shale Play.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Michael H Young; Brad D Wolaver; John R Andrews; Caroline L Breton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Comparison of Recent Oil and Gas, Wind Energy, and Other Anthropogenic Landscape Alteration Factors in Texas Through 2014.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Brad D Wolaver; Benjamin J Labay; Travis J LaDuc; Charles M Duran; Wade A Ryberg; Toby J Hibbitts; John R Andrews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Analysis of road development and associated agricultural land use change.

Authors:  Hakan Alphan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  An Improved Approach for Forecasting Ecological Impacts from Future Drilling in Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas Plays.

Authors:  Brad D Wolaver; Jon Paul Pierre; Svetlana A Ikonnikova; John R Andrews; Guinevere McDaid; Wade A Ryberg; Toby J Hibbitts; Charles M Duran; Benjamin J Labay; Travis J LaDuc
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.