OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine whether the new-generation Trifecta (St Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minn) bovine aortic valve bioprosthesis, which is designed for supra-annular positioning, produces early postoperative hemodynamic results comparable to or better than those of the Mitroflow (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy) or Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) bovine aortic valve bioprostheses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Trifecta, Mitroflow, or Perimount Magna bovine pericardial prosthesis at Mayo Clinic between June 2007 and December 2012 and analyzed early postoperative hemodynamic performance by Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: A total of 1436 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (Trifecta in 196, Mitroflow in 1135, Perimount Magna in 105). Preoperative characteristics and early clinical outcomes were similar among the 3 valve groups. The average mean gradients were lower and valve areas were greater with the Trifecta valves. For the Trifecta, Mitroflow, and Perimount Magna valves, the average mean gradient was 11.4 mm Hg, 16.9 mm Hg, and 14.1 mm Hg, respectively; the effective orifice area was 2.22 cm2, 1.85 cm2, and 2.09 cm2, respectively; and the indexed effective orifice area was 1.14 cm2/m2, 0.96 cm2/m2, and 1.07 cm2/m2, respectively (all P<.001). Similar statistical significance was found when data were stratified by valve size. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (indexed effective orifice area<0.60 cm2/m2) was detected in 1.3% of patients (n=2/150) with the Trifecta, 5.8% of patients (n=44/758) with the Mitroflow, and 3.2% of patients (n=3/95) with the Perimount Magna (P=.048). CONCLUSIONS: Early hemodynamic postoperative performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis is favorable. Additional follow-up should determine whether these small hemodynamic differences will persist and influence later clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine whether the new-generation Trifecta (St Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minn) bovine aortic valve bioprosthesis, which is designed for supra-annular positioning, produces early postoperative hemodynamic results comparable to or better than those of the Mitroflow (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy) or Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) bovine aortic valve bioprostheses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Trifecta, Mitroflow, or Perimount Magna bovine pericardial prosthesis at Mayo Clinic between June 2007 and December 2012 and analyzed early postoperative hemodynamic performance by Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: A total of 1436 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (Trifecta in 196, Mitroflow in 1135, Perimount Magna in 105). Preoperative characteristics and early clinical outcomes were similar among the 3 valve groups. The average mean gradients were lower and valve areas were greater with the Trifecta valves. For the Trifecta, Mitroflow, and Perimount Magna valves, the average mean gradient was 11.4 mm Hg, 16.9 mm Hg, and 14.1 mm Hg, respectively; the effective orifice area was 2.22 cm2, 1.85 cm2, and 2.09 cm2, respectively; and the indexed effective orifice area was 1.14 cm2/m2, 0.96 cm2/m2, and 1.07 cm2/m2, respectively (all P<.001). Similar statistical significance was found when data were stratified by valve size. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (indexed effective orifice area<0.60 cm2/m2) was detected in 1.3% of patients (n=2/150) with the Trifecta, 5.8% of patients (n=44/758) with the Mitroflow, and 3.2% of patients (n=3/95) with the Perimount Magna (P=.048). CONCLUSIONS: Early hemodynamic postoperative performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis is favorable. Additional follow-up should determine whether these small hemodynamic differences will persist and influence later clinical outcomes.
Authors: Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Fabio Bertoldo; Sara Rita Vacirca; Monica Greci; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Claudio Capelli; Chiara Corsini; Dario Biscarini; Francesco Ruffini; Francesco Migliavacca; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano; Martin Andreas; Gaetano Burriesci; Claus Rath Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Giovanni Mariscalco; Silvia Mariani; Samuele Bichi; Andrea Biondi; Andrea Blasio; Paolo Borsani; Fabrizio Corti; Benedetta De Chiara; Riccardo Gherli; Cristian Leva; Claudio Francesco Russo; Giordano Tasca; Paolo Vanelli; Ottavio Alfieri; Carlo Antona; Germano Di Credico; Giampiero Esposito; Amando Gamba; Luigi Martinelli; Lorenzo Menicanti; Giovanni Paolini; Cesare Beghi Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Philipp Marx; Wojciech Kowalczyk; Aydin Demircioglu; Gary Neil Brault; Hermann Wendt; Sharaf-Eldin Shehada; Konstantinos Tsagakis; Mohamed El Gabry; Heinz Jakob; Daniel Wendt Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.411