Stephen D Thorp1, Jawad Khazaal2, Grace Yu2, Jessica L Parker3, Tomasz A Timek4. 1. General Surgery Residency, Spectrum Health/Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, USA. 2. College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, United States of America. 3. Office of Research and Education, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, United States of America. 4. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Magna Ease aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) is a third-generation bioprosthetic valve developed as a modification of the well-studied Perimount and Magna valve designs. This study's objective is to evaluate a large, single-centre experience with Magna Ease aortic valve replacement (AVR) focusing on clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance. METHODS: All patients undergoing AVR between 8/2010 and 10/2018 at our institution implanted with the Magna Ease valve were included except those undergoing ventricular assist device or congenital aortic surgery. Primary outcomes were overall survival and freedom from reoperation. Mean transprosthetic gradient (mTPG) and structural valve deterioration (SVD) served as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Totally 1126 consecutive implantations of Magna Ease valves were included. Concomitant procedures were performed in 56.5% (n = 636). No severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was present at implantation. Overall survival at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years and 9 years was 97.2%, 95.0%, 86.1% and 78.2%, respectively, with improved survival for isolated AVR. Total of 2.4% (n = 27) of patients required reoperation with 0.3% (n = 4) for SVD. Echocardiographic follow-up data revealed low mTPG throughout the study period. SVD occurred in 28.7% of patients at a mean of 3.9 years post implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Magna Ease AVR maintained low mean transprosthetic gradients throughout mid-term evaluation and was associated with excellent overall survival and freedom from reoperation at nine years post implantation.
OBJECTIVES: The Magna Ease aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) is a third-generation bioprosthetic valve developed as a modification of the well-studied Perimount and Magna valve designs. This study's objective is to evaluate a large, single-centre experience with Magna Ease aortic valve replacement (AVR) focusing on clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance. METHODS: All patients undergoing AVR between 8/2010 and 10/2018 at our institution implanted with the Magna Ease valve were included except those undergoing ventricular assist device or congenital aortic surgery. Primary outcomes were overall survival and freedom from reoperation. Mean transprosthetic gradient (mTPG) and structural valve deterioration (SVD) served as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Totally 1126 consecutive implantations of Magna Ease valves were included. Concomitant procedures were performed in 56.5% (n = 636). No severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was present at implantation. Overall survival at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years and 9 years was 97.2%, 95.0%, 86.1% and 78.2%, respectively, with improved survival for isolated AVR. Total of 2.4% (n = 27) of patients required reoperation with 0.3% (n = 4) for SVD. Echocardiographic follow-up data revealed low mTPG throughout the study period. SVD occurred in 28.7% of patients at a mean of 3.9 years post implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Magna Ease AVR maintained low mean transprosthetic gradients throughout mid-term evaluation and was associated with excellent overall survival and freedom from reoperation at nine years post implantation.
Authors: Arman Kilic; Ibrahim Sultan; Forozan Navid; Edgar Aranda-Michel; Danny Chu; Floyd Thoma; Thomas G Gleason Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: R Scott McClure; Narendren Narayanasamy; Esther Wiegerinck; Stuart Lipsitz; Ann Maloney; John G Byrne; Sary F Aranki; Gregory S Couper; Lawrence H Cohn Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Bart Meuris; Herbert De Praetere; Marina Strasly; Piero Trabucco; John C Lai; Peter Verbrugghe; Paul Herijgers Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Murat Ugur; Rakesh M Suri; Richard C Daly; Joseph A Dearani; Soon J Park; Lyle D Joyce; Harold M Burkhart; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Stéphane Kermen; Juliette Strella; Arthur Aupart; Fabien Espitalier; Michel Aupart; Anne Bernard; Thierry Bourguignon Journal: JTCVS Open Date: 2022-05-29