J Caroff1, C Mihalea2, H Neki2, D Ruijters3, L Ikka2, N Benachour2, J Moret2, L Spelle2. 1. From the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.C., C.M., H.N., L.I., N.B., J.M., L.S.), Beaujon Medical Centre, Clichy, France Jildaz.caroff@gmail.com. 2. From the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.C., C.M., H.N., L.I., N.B., J.M., L.S.), Beaujon Medical Centre, Clichy, France. 3. Interventional X-Ray Innovation (D.R.), Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The WEB aneurysm embolization system is still under evaluation but seems to be a promising technique to treat wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. However, this device is barely visible using conventional DSA; thus, high-resolution contrast-enhanced flat panel detector CT (VasoCT) may be useful before detachment to assess the sizing and positioning of the WEB. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interest of VasoCT during WEB procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2012 to July 2013, twelve patients (10 women and 2 men; age range, 44-55 years) were treated for 13 intracranial aneurysms with the WEB device. DSA and VasoCT were used and compared to depict any protrusion of the device in parent arteries before detachment. Two neuroradiologists reviewed each VasoCT scan, and the quality was graded on a subjective quality scale. RESULTS: The mesh of the WEB was very well-depicted in all cases, allowing a very good assessment of its deployment. Device protrusion was clearly detected with VasoCT in 5 cases, leading to WEB repositioning or size substitution. During follow-up, VasoCT also allows good assessment of eventual residual blood flow inside the aneurysm or the WEB device. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike DSA, VasoCT is an excellent tool to assess WEB deployment and positioning. In our experience, it allowed a precise evaluation of the WEB sizing and its relation to the parent vessel. Such information very likely enhances the ability to safely use this device, avoiding potential thromboembolic events in cases of protrusion in the parent arteries.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The WEB aneurysm embolization system is still under evaluation but seems to be a promising technique to treat wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. However, this device is barely visible using conventional DSA; thus, high-resolution contrast-enhanced flat panel detector CT (VasoCT) may be useful before detachment to assess the sizing and positioning of the WEB. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interest of VasoCT during WEB procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2012 to July 2013, twelve patients (10 women and 2 men; age range, 44-55 years) were treated for 13 intracranial aneurysms with the WEB device. DSA and VasoCT were used and compared to depict any protrusion of the device in parent arteries before detachment. Two neuroradiologists reviewed each VasoCT scan, and the quality was graded on a subjective quality scale. RESULTS: The mesh of the WEB was very well-depicted in all cases, allowing a very good assessment of its deployment. Device protrusion was clearly detected with VasoCT in 5 cases, leading to WEB repositioning or size substitution. During follow-up, VasoCT also allows good assessment of eventual residual blood flow inside the aneurysm or the WEB device. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike DSA, VasoCT is an excellent tool to assess WEB deployment and positioning. In our experience, it allowed a precise evaluation of the WEB sizing and its relation to the parent vessel. Such information very likely enhances the ability to safely use this device, avoiding potential thromboembolic events in cases of protrusion in the parent arteries.
Authors: N V Patel; M J Gounis; A K Wakhloo; N Noordhoek; J Blijd; D Babic; D Takhtani; S-K Lee; A Norbash Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Götz Benndorf; Charles M Strother; Benjamin Claus; Ramin Naeini; Hesham Morsi; Richard Klucznik; Michael E Mawad Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joachim Klisch; Vojtech Sychra; Christoph Strasilla; Thomas Liebig; David Fiorella Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: L Pierot; T Liebig; V Sychra; K Kadziolka; F Dorn; C Strasilla; C Kabbasch; J Klisch Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: I M J van der Bom; S Y Hou; A S Puri; G Spilberg; D Ruijters; P van de Haar; B Carelsen; S Vedantham; M J Gounis; A K Wakhloo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Rudolph M Snoeren; Michael Söderman; Johannes N Kroon; Ruben B Roijers; Peter H N de With; Drazenko Babic Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: A Rouchaud; C Ramana; W Brinjikji; Y-H Ding; D Dai; T Gunderson; J Cebral; D F Kallmes; R Kadirvel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Caroff; C Mihalea; J Klisch; C Strasilla; A Berlis; T Patankar; W Weber; D Behme; E A Jacobsen; T Liebig; S Prothmann; C Cognard; T Finkenzeller; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Liebig; C Kabbasch; C Strasilla; A Berlis; W Weber; L Pierot; T Patankar; X Barreau; J Dervin; A Kuršumović; S Rath; B Lubicz; J Klisch Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Caroff; H Neki; C Mihalea; F D'Argento; H Abdel Khalek; L Ikka; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.825