Literature DB >> 24515818

SAMPL4 & DOCK3.7: lessons for automated docking procedures.

Ryan G Coleman1, Teague Sterling, Dahlia R Weiss.   

Abstract

The SAMPL4 challenges were used to test current automated methods for solvation energy, virtual screening, pose and affinity prediction of the molecular docking pipeline DOCK 3.7. Additionally, first-order models of binding affinity were proposed as milestones for any method predicting binding affinity. Several important discoveries about the molecular docking software were made during the challenge: (1) Solvation energies of ligands were five-fold worse than any other method used in SAMPL4, including methods that were similarly fast, (2) HIV Integrase is a challenging target, but automated docking on the correct allosteric site performed well in terms of virtual screening and pose prediction (compared to other methods) but affinity prediction, as expected, was very poor, (3) Molecular docking grid sizes can be very important, serious errors were discovered with default settings that have been adjusted for all future work. Overall, lessons from SAMPL4 suggest many changes to molecular docking tools, not just DOCK 3.7, that could improve the state of the art. Future difficulties and projects will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24515818      PMCID: PMC4006303          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9722-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  36 in total

1.  A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.

Authors:  Binqing Q Wei; Walter A Baase; Larry H Weaver; Brian W Matthews; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Rapid context-dependent ligand desolvation in molecular docking.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Analysis of SM8 and Zap TK calculations and their geometric sensitivity.

Authors:  Benjamin A Ellingson; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Virtual computational chemistry laboratory--design and description.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Johann Gasteiger; Roberto Todeschini; Andrea Mauri; David Livingstone; Peter Ertl; Vladimir A Palyulin; Eugene V Radchenko; Nikolay S Zefirov; Alexander S Makarenko; Vsevolod Yu Tanchuk; Volodymyr V Prokopenko
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 8.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Interrogating HIV integrase for compounds that bind--a SAMPL challenge.

Authors:  Thomas S Peat; Olan Dolezal; Janet Newman; David Mobley; John J Deadman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Michael Carchia; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  10 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Combining in silico and in cerebro approaches for virtual screening and pose prediction in SAMPL4.

Authors:  Arnout R D Voet; Ashutosh Kumar; Francois Berenger; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Bayesian Model Averaging for Ensemble-Based Estimates of Solvation-Free Energies.

Authors:  Luke J Gosink; Christopher C Overall; Sarah M Reehl; Paul D Whitney; David L Mobley; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Shuai Liu; Nathan M Lim; Karisa L Wymer; Alexander L Perryman; Stefano Forli; Nanjie Deng; Justin Su; Kim Branson; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Structure-inspired design of β-arrestin-biased ligands for aminergic GPCRs.

Authors:  John D McCorvy; Kyle V Butler; Brendan Kelly; Katie Rechsteiner; Joel Karpiak; Robin M Betz; Bethany L Kormos; Brian K Shoichet; Ron O Dror; Jian Jin; Bryan L Roth
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  Towards a critical evaluation of an empirical and volume-based solvation function for ligand docking.

Authors:  Heloisa S Muniz; Alessandro S Nascimento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Computation of host-guest binding free energies with a new quantum mechanics based mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Tosaporn Sattasathuchana; Emilie Guidez; Simon P Webb; Kilinoelani Montgomery; Hussna Yasini; Iara F M Pedreira; Mark S Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.

Authors:  Majda Misini Ignjatović; Octav Caldararu; Geng Dong; Camila Muñoz-Gutierrez; Francisco Adasme-Carreño; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.686

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.