Literature DB >> 9282894

Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea.

R Charlet de Sauvage1, D Lima da Costa, J P Erre, J M Aran.   

Abstract

In the electrical stimulation (ES) of auditory pathways, the type of stimulus and the electrode/tissue interface are critical parameters for the safety and efficacy of the protocol. In this study the influence of alternate pulses, applied between round window and vertex electrodes in chronically implanted guinea pigs, and maintained during 1 and 25 daily periods of 2 h (short-term and long-term experiments, respectively), was investigated. ES consisted of monophasic current pulses of +/- 70 microA and 300 (micro)s in duration at a rate of 167/s, with alternate polarity. Compound Action Potential (CAP) audiograms, amplitudes and latencies of click-evoked CAPs, amplitudes and latencies of electrically-evoked auditory responses (EARs), and electrode impedances, were measured periodically outside or during the ES periods. Short-term ES induced no change in CAP thresholds, amplitude and latency in response to clicks at 80 dB above normal threshold, but induced a slight latency increase and amplitude decrease of the EAR, correlated with an exponential decay of the electrode impedance. On a long-term basis, CAP audiograms and latencies did not change significantly, whereas CAP amplitudes and electrode impedances increased, in correlation with each other. In control guinea pigs receiving no ES, the same CAP amplitude and impedance changes were observed over the same long-term period. The EAR and CAP changes can be explained by a variation of the electrical impedance of the electrode/tissue interface. This is possibly due to a change in electrolytes around the electrode under the influence of the ES for the short-term variation, and to an electrode encapsulation by fibrous tissue independent of the ES for the long-term change. In itself, and under the conditions of this experiment, the ES demonstrated no adverse effects on the auditory function and can be safely used for inner-ear exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9282894     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00066-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  T Hanekom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Peter Seligman; Robert Cowan; Robert Shepherd
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A fully implantable rodent neural stimulator.

Authors:  D W J Perry; D B Grayden; R K Shepherd; J B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Changes in biphasic electrode impedance with protein adsorption and cell growth.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Christie Huang; Dusan Milojevic; Robert Shepherd; Robert Cowan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-20

7.  Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen; Ann Yi-Chiun Chuang; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.

Authors:  Maciej Wilk; Roland Hessler; Kenneth Mugridge; Claude Jolly; Michael Fehr; Thomas Lenarz; Verena Scheper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.