Literature DB >> 31832642

Differential Effects of Open- and Closed-Loop Intracortical Microstimulation on Firing Patterns of Neurons in Distant Cortical Areas.

Alberto Averna1,2,3, Valentina Pasquale3, Maxwell D Murphy4, Maria Piera Rogantin5, Gustaf M Van Acker6, Randolph J Nudo4,7, Michela Chiappalone1, David J Guggenmos4,7.   

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation can be used successfully to modulate neuronal activity. Activity-dependent stimulation (ADS), in which action potentials recorded extracellularly from a single neuron are used to trigger stimulation at another cortical location (closed-loop), is an effective treatment for behavioral recovery after brain lesion, but the related neurophysiological changes are still not clear. Here, we investigated the ability of ADS and random stimulation (RS) to alter firing patterns of distant cortical locations. We recorded 591 neuronal units from 23 Long-Evan healthy anesthetized rats. Stimulation was delivered to either forelimb or barrel field somatosensory cortex, using either RS or ADS triggered from spikes recorded in the rostral forelimb area (RFA). Both RS and ADS stimulation protocols rapidly altered spike firing within RFA compared with no stimulation. We observed increase in firing rates and change of spike patterns. ADS was more effective than RS in increasing evoked spikes during the stimulation periods, by producing a reliable, progressive increase in stimulus-related activity over time and an increased coupling of the trigger channel with the network. These results are critical for understanding the efficacy of closed-loop electrical microstimulation protocols in altering activity patterns in interconnected brain networks, thus modulating cortical state and functional connectivity.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anesthesia; electrical stimulation; forelimb; motor cortex; neuronal plasticity; neurons; neurophysiology; rats; somatosensory cortex

Year:  2020        PMID: 31832642      PMCID: PMC7197073          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  73 in total

Review 1.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review.

Authors:  J B Ranck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  NMDA receptor hypofunction produces opposite effects on prefrontal cortex interneurons and pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Houman Homayoun; Bita Moghaddam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Stimulation on demand: closing the loop on deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Fernando J Santos; Rui M Costa; Fatuel Tecuapetla
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy.

Authors:  Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  The asynchronous state in cortical circuits.

Authors:  Alfonso Renart; Jaime de la Rocha; Peter Bartho; Liad Hollender; Néstor Parga; Alex Reyes; Kenneth D Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert consensus and review of key issues.

Authors:  Jeff M Bronstein; Michele Tagliati; Ron L Alterman; Andres M Lozano; Jens Volkmann; Alessandro Stefani; Fay B Horak; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Paul Krack; Rajesh Pahwa; Jaimie M Henderson; Marwan I Hariz; Roy A Bakay; Ali Rezai; William J Marks; Elena Moro; Jerrold L Vitek; Frances M Weaver; Robert E Gross; Mahlon R DeLong
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-10-11

7.  Therapeutic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsonian rats directly influences motor cortex.

Authors:  Qian Li; Ya Ke; Danny C W Chan; Zhong-Ming Qian; Ken K L Yung; Ho Ko; Gordon W Arbuthnott; Wing-Ho Yung
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Intracranial stimulation therapy for epilepsy.

Authors:  Tara L Skarpaas; Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  John F Kerrigan; Brian Litt; Robert S Fisher; Stephen Cranstoun; Jacqueline A French; David E Blum; Marc Dichter; Andrew Shetter; Gordon Baltuch; Jurg Jaggi; Selma Krone; MaryAnn Brodie; Mark Rise; Nina Graves
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Therapeutic deep brain stimulation reduces cortical phase-amplitude coupling in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Coralie de Hemptinne; Nicole C Swann; Jill L Ostrem; Elena S Ryapolova-Webb; Marta San Luciano; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Philip A Starr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Injecting Information into the Mammalian Cortex: Progress, Challenges, and Promise.

Authors:  Kevin A Mazurek; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  LFP Analysis of Brain Injured Anesthetized Animals Undergoing Closed-Loop Intracortical Stimulation.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Federico Barban; Marta Care; Maxwell D Murphy; Riccardo Iandolo; Lorenzo De Michieli; Randolph J Nudo; David J Guggenmos; Michela Chiappalone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  SANTIA: a Matlab-based open-source toolbox for artifact detection and removal from extracellular neuronal signals.

Authors:  Marcos Fabietti; Mufti Mahmud; Ahmad Lotfi; M Shamim Kaiser; Alberto Averna; David J Guggenmos; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; Jianhui Chen
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2021-07-20

4.  The impact of closed-loop intracortical stimulation on neural activity in brain-injured, anesthetized animals.

Authors:  Marta Carè; Alberto Averna; David J Guggenmos; Michela Chiappalone; Federico Barban; Marianna Semprini; Lorenzo De Michieli; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Activity dependent stimulation increases synaptic efficacy in spared pathways in an anesthetized rat model of spinal cord contusion injury.

Authors:  Jordan A Borrell; Dora Krizsan-Agbas; Randolph J Nudo; Shawn B Frost
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.976

6.  Entrainment of Network Activity by Closed-Loop Microstimulation in Healthy Ambulatory Rats.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Page Hayley; Maxwell D Murphy; Federico Barban; Jimmy Nguyen; Stefano Buccelli; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; David J Guggenmos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  Mapping of subthalamic nucleus using microelectrode recordings during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Nabin Koirala; Lucas Serrano; Steffen Paschen; Daniela Falk; Abdul Rauf Anwar; Pradeep Kuravi; Günther Deuschl; Sergiu Groppa; Muthuraman Muthuraman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.