Literature DB >> 24497052

Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers.

Yu Shi1, Kevin J Glaser, Sudhakar K Venkatesh, Ephraim I Ben-Abraham, Richard L Ehman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using three-dimensional (3D) MR elastography (MRE) to determine the stiffness of the pancreas in healthy volunteers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5 Tesla MRE exams using an accelerated echo planar imaging (EPI) pulse sequence with low-frequency vibrations (40 and 60 Hz). Stiffness was calculated with a 3D direct inversion algorithm. The mean shear stiffness in five pancreatic subregions (uncinate, head, neck, body, and tail) and the corresponding liver stiffness were calculated. The intrasubject coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as a measure of the reproducibility for each volunteer.
RESULTS: The mean shear stiffness (average of values obtained in different pancreatic subregions) was (1.15 ± 0.17) kPa at 40 Hz, and (2.09 ± 0.33) kPa at 60 Hz. The corresponding liver stiffness was higher than the pancreas stiffness at 40 Hz ([1.60 ± 0.21] kPa, mean pancreas-to-liver stiffness ratio: 0.72), but similar at 60Hz ([2.12 ± 0.23) kPa, mean ratio: 0.95). The mean intrasubject CV for each pancreatic subregion was lower at 40 Hz than 60 Hz (P < 0.05 for all subregions, range: 11.9-15.7% at 40 Hz and 16.5-19.6% at 60 Hz).
CONCLUSION: The 3D pancreatic MRE can provide promising and reproducible stiffness measurements throughout the pancreas, with more consistent data acquired at 40 Hz.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR elastography; feasibility; healthy volunteers; pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24497052      PMCID: PMC4122650          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  17 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images.

Authors:  A Manduca; D S Lake; S A Kruse; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain.

Authors:  U Hamhaber; I Sack; S Papazoglou; J Rump; D Klatt; J Braun
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Evaluation of a material parameter extraction algorithm using MRI-based displacement measurements.

Authors:  A J Romano; J A Bucaro; R L Ehnan; J J Shirron
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: normal liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Gang Wang; Lynette L S Teo; Bertrand W L Ang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Daniel R Ganger; Josh Levitsky; Laura A Sternick; Robert J McCarthy; Zongming E Chen; Charles W Fasanati; Bradley Bolster; Saurabh Shah; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Reed A Omary; Richard L Ehman; Frank H Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Portal hypertension correlates with splenic stiffness as measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Geir I Nedredal; Meng Yin; Travis McKenzie; Joseph Lillegard; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Jayant Talwalkar; Richard Ehman; Scott L Nyberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  Heiko Witt; Minoti V Apte; Volker Keim; Jeremy S Wilson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Jan Janssen; Eva Schlörer; Lucas Greiner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Correlation of MR elastography with morphometric quantification of liver fibrosis (Fibro-C-Index) in chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Shuoyu Xu; Dean Tai; Hanry Yu; Aileen Wee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Paul Manning; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Florin Vaida; Meng Yin; Kevin Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Anushri Parakh; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-05

Review 4.  Measuring the elastic modulus of soft culture surfaces and three-dimensional hydrogels using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Michael D A Norman; Silvia A Ferreira; Geraldine M Jowett; Laurent Bozec; Eileen Gentleman
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Morisaka; Utaroh Motosugi; Kevin J Glaser; Shintaro Ichikawa; Richard L Ehman; Katsuhiro Sano; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Pancreatic stiffness response to an oral glucose load in obese adults measured by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ruoyun Ji; Jiahui Li; Ziying Yin; Yanqing Liu; Lizhuo Cang; Min Wang; Yu Shi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Fei Xia; Qiu-Ju Li; Jia-Hui Li; Bing Yu; Yue Li; He An; Kevin J Glaser; Shengzhen Tao; Richard L Ehman; Qi-Yong Guo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.