Literature DB >> 29729951

Pancreatic stiffness response to an oral glucose load in obese adults measured by magnetic resonance elastography.

Ruoyun Ji1, Jiahui Li1, Ziying Yin2, Yanqing Liu1, Lizhuo Cang1, Min Wang1, Yu Shi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To test the feasibility of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for assessing changes in pancreatic stiffness of obese adults administered an oral glucose load.
METHODS: MRE scans were performed on 21 asymptomatic obese volunteers (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2) before and after receiving a 75-g oral glucose load, and repeated in 7 days without a glucose load. Shear waves at 40 and 60 Hz were introduced into the upper abdomen by a pneumatic drum driver (diameter of 12 cm). Two radiologists subjectively graded the overall quality of the wave images of the pancreas using a scale from 1 to 4, in which suboptimal image quality was considered to be scores of 1 and 2.
RESULTS: Good inter-observer agreement was found for image quality at both frequencies (kappa = 0.805 for 40 Hz and 0.762 for 60 Hz). The median overall image quality score was significantly higher in 40 Hz than that of 60 Hz (4 versus 2). At 40 Hz, pancreatic stiffness in response to oral glucose had a decrease of 6.7% (pre vs post: 1.17 ± 0.13 kPa vs 1.08 ± 0.12 kPa; P < 0.001), whereas the change in stiffness was not significant at 60 Hz (pre vs post: 2.01 ± 0.21 kPa vs 2.02 ± 0.24 kPa; P = 0.695). Excellent intersession agreement was found for MRE acquisitions at 40 Hz with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.947 (95% confidence interval: 0.913-0.967).
CONCLUSION: MRE at 40 Hz provides good-quality wave images and high sensitivity to changes in the mechanical properties of pancreatic tissue in obese volunteers after an oral glucose load.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glucose; Magnetic resonance elastography; Obese; Pancreas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729951      PMCID: PMC6183057          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  27 in total

1.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: differentiation with triple-phase helical CT.

Authors:  Yasunari Yamada; Hiromu Mori; Shunro Matsumoto; Hiro Kiyosue; Yuko Hori; Norio Hongo
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; R L Ehman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines.

Authors:  Darwin L Conwell; Linda S Lee; Dhiraj Yadav; Daniel S Longnecker; Frank H Miller; Koenraad J Mortele; Michael J Levy; Richard Kwon; John G Lieb; Tyler Stevens; Phillip P Toskes; Timothy B Gardner; Andres Gelrud; Bechien U Wu; Christopher E Forsmark; Santhi S Vege
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Inflammation, autophagy, and obesity: common features in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ilya Gukovsky; Ning Li; Jelena Todoric; Anna Gukovskaya; Michael Karin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.

Authors:  H An; Y Shi; Q Guo; Y Liu
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 6.  Chronic pancreatitis, pseudotumors and other tumor-like lesions.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Bogdan Dzyubak; Kevin J Glaser; Qiuju Li; Jiahui Li; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses using magnetic resonance elastography with spin-echo echo planar imaging and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Feng Gao; Yue Li; Shengzhen Tao; Bing Yu; Zaiyi Liu; Yanqing Liu; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Stimulation by glucose of the blood flow to the pancreatic islets of the rat.

Authors:  L Jansson; C Hellerström
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Pancreatic islet blood flow and its measurement.

Authors:  Leif Jansson; Andreea Barbu; Birgitta Bodin; Carl Johan Drott; Daniel Espes; Xiang Gao; Liza Grapensparr; Örjan Källskog; Joey Lau; Hanna Liljebäck; Fredrik Palm; My Quach; Monica Sandberg; Victoria Strömberg; Sara Ullsten; Per-Ola Carlsson
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.384

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.

Authors:  Manil D Chouhan; Louisa Firmin; Samantha Read; Zahir Amin; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Practical and clinical applications of pancreatic magnetic resonance elastography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Steinkohl; Davide Bertoli; Tine Maria Hansen; Søren Schou Olesen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Jens Brøndum Frøkjær
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  Normative Pancreatic Stiffness Levels and Related Influences Established by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Volunteers.

Authors:  Youli Xu; Xiaoli Cai; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Gongyu Lan; Xianyi Zhang; Ruoyun Ji
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas of Individuals With Diabetes.

Authors:  John Virostko
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  Building Biomimetic Potency Tests for Islet Transplantation.

Authors:  Aaron L Glieberman; Benjamin D Pope; Douglas A Melton; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 9.461

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.