Literature DB >> 24486105

Nonstochastic reprogramming from a privileged somatic cell state.

Shangqin Guo1, Xiaoyuan Zi2, Vincent P Schulz3, Jijun Cheng4, Mei Zhong5, Sebastian H J Koochaki5, Cynthia M Megyola5, Xinghua Pan4, Kartoosh Heydari6, Sherman M Weissman7, Patrick G Gallagher8, Diane S Krause9, Rong Fan10, Jun Lu7.   

Abstract

Reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotency by Yamanaka factors is usually slow and inefficient and is thought to be a stochastic process. We identified a privileged somatic cell state, from which acquisition of pluripotency could occur in a nonstochastic manner. Subsets of murine hematopoietic progenitors are privileged whose progeny cells predominantly adopt the pluripotent fate with activation of endogenous Oct4 locus after four to five divisions in reprogramming conditions. Privileged cells display an ultrafast cell cycle of ∼8 hr. In fibroblasts, a subpopulation cycling at a similar ultrafast speed is observed after 6 days of factor expression and is increased by p53 knockdown. This ultrafast cycling population accounts for >99% of the bulk reprogramming activity in wild-type or p53 knockdown fibroblasts. Our data demonstrate that the stochastic nature of reprogramming can be overcome in a privileged somatic cell state and suggest that cell-cycle acceleration toward a critical threshold is an important bottleneck for reprogramming. PAPERCLIP:
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24486105      PMCID: PMC4318260          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  53 in total

1.  Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Sarah Eminli; Adlen Foudi; Matthias Stadtfeld; Nimet Maherali; Tim Ahfeldt; Gustavo Mostoslavsky; Hanno Hock; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

Authors:  Hyenjong Hong; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Osami Kanagawa; Masato Nakagawa; Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Immortalization eliminates a roadblock during cellular reprogramming into iPS cells.

Authors:  Jochen Utikal; Jose M Polo; Matthias Stadtfeld; Nimet Maherali; Warakorn Kulalert; Ryan M Walsh; Adam Khalil; James G Rheinwald; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Single-gene transgenic mouse strains for reprogramming adult somatic cells.

Authors:  Bryce W Carey; Styliani Markoulaki; Caroline Beard; Jacob Hanna; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Senescence impairs successful reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ana Banito; Sheikh T Rashid; Juan Carlos Acosta; SiDe Li; Carlos F Pereira; Imbisaat Geti; Sandra Pinho; Jose C Silva; Veronique Azuara; Martin Walsh; Ludovic Vallier; Jesús Gil
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Reprogramming of murine and human somatic cells using a single polycistronic vector.

Authors:  Bryce W Carey; Styliani Markoulaki; Jacob Hanna; Kris Saha; Qing Gao; Maisam Mitalipova; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Trond Aasen; Angel Raya; Maria J Barrero; Elena Garreta; Antonella Consiglio; Federico Gonzalez; Rita Vassena; Josipa Bilić; Vladimir Pekarik; Gustavo Tiscornia; Michael Edel; Stéphanie Boué; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Stoichiometric and temporal requirements of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc expression for efficient human iPSC induction and differentiation.

Authors:  Eirini P Papapetrou; Mark J Tomishima; Stuart M Chambers; Yvonne Mica; Evan Reed; Jayanthi Menon; Viviane Tabar; Qianxing Mo; Lorenz Studer; Michel Sadelain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Bernardo Pando; Jeroen van Zon; Christopher J Lengner; Menno P Creyghton; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  86 in total

1.  Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse neural stem cells and small intestinal epithelial cells by small molecule compounds.

Authors:  Junqing Ye; Jian Ge; Xu Zhang; Lin Cheng; Zhengyuan Zhang; Shan He; Yuping Wang; Hua Lin; Weifeng Yang; Junfang Liu; Yang Zhao; Hongkui Deng
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  Molecular features of cellular reprogramming and development.

Authors:  Zachary D Smith; Camille Sindhu; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Epigenetic predisposition to reprogramming fates in somatic cells.

Authors:  Maayan Pour; Inbar Pilzer; Roni Rosner; Zachary D Smith; Alexander Meissner; Iftach Nachman
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Cell type-specific expression profile and signaling requirements in early hematopoietic reprogramming.

Authors:  Lan Kang; Jun Wu; Yu Tao; Haolan Li; Xiaolei Liu; Shaorong Gao; Qian-Fei Wang
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  Dysfunctional mitochondrial fission impairs cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Javier Prieto; Marian León; Xavier Ponsoda; Francisco García-García; Roque Bort; Eva Serna; Manuela Barneo-Muñoz; Francesc Palau; Joaquín Dopazo; Carlos López-García; Josema Torres
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Reprogramming Enhancers in Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, iPSC Technology, and Direct Conversion.

Authors:  Daekee Kwon; Minjun Ji; Seunghee Lee; Kwang Won Seo; Kyung-Sun Kang
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  The p53 Pathway Controls SOX2-Mediated Reprogramming in the Adult Mouse Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Lei-Lei Wang; Zhida Su; Wenjiao Tai; Yuhua Zou; Xiao-Ming Xu; Chun-Li Zhang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells in cancer research and precision oncology.

Authors:  Eirini P Papapetrou
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  Mechanisms underlying the formation of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Federico González; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.814

10.  Tankyrase inhibition promotes a stable human naïve pluripotent state with improved functionality.

Authors:  Ludovic Zimmerlin; Tea Soon Park; Jeffrey S Huo; Karan Verma; Sarshan R Pather; C Conover Talbot; Jasmin Agarwal; Diana Steppan; Yang W Zhang; Michael Considine; Hong Guo; Xiufeng Zhong; Christian Gutierrez; Leslie Cope; M Valeria Canto-Soler; Alan D Friedman; Stephen B Baylin; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.