Literature DB >> 19668214

Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells.

Sarah Eminli1, Adlen Foudi, Matthias Stadtfeld, Nimet Maherali, Tim Ahfeldt, Gustavo Mostoslavsky, Hanno Hock, Konrad Hochedlinger.   

Abstract

The reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells upon overexpression of the transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc is inefficient. It has been assumed that the somatic differentiation state provides a barrier for efficient reprogramming; however, direct evidence for this notion is lacking. Here, we tested the potential of mouse hematopoietic cells at different stages of differentiation to be reprogrammed into iPS cells. We show that hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells give rise to iPS cells up to 300 times more efficiently than terminally differentiated B and T cells do, yielding reprogramming efficiencies of up to 28%. Our data provide evidence that the differentiation stage of the starting cell has a critical influence on the efficiency of reprogramming into iPS cells. Moreover, we identify hematopoietic progenitors as an attractive cell type for applications of iPS cell technology in research and therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19668214      PMCID: PMC3987895          DOI: 10.1038/ng.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  51 in total

Review 1.  Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Nimet Maherali; David T Breault; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution.

Authors:  Nimet Maherali; Rupa Sridharan; Wei Xie; Jochen Utikal; Sarah Eminli; Katrin Arnold; Matthias Stadtfeld; Robin Yachechko; Jason Tchieu; Rudolf Jaenisch; Kathrin Plath; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  W E Lowry; L Richter; R Yachechko; A D Pyle; J Tchieu; R Sridharan; A T Clark; K Plath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors.

Authors:  In-Hyun Park; Rui Zhao; Jason A West; Akiko Yabuuchi; Hongguang Huo; Tan A Ince; Paul H Lerou; M William Lensch; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Oct4 expression is not required for mouse somatic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Christopher J Lengner; Fernando D Camargo; Konrad Hochedlinger; G Grant Welstead; Samir Zaidi; Sumita Gokhale; Hans R Scholer; Alexey Tomilin; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells.

Authors:  Junying Yu; Maxim A Vodyanik; Kim Smuga-Otto; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Jennifer L Frane; Shulan Tian; Jeff Nie; Gudrun A Jonsdottir; Victor Ruotti; Ron Stewart; Igor I Slukvin; James A Thomson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Takahashi; Koji Tanabe; Mari Ohnuki; Megumi Narita; Tomoko Ichisaka; Kiichiro Tomoda; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Tomoko Ichisaka; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state.

Authors:  Marius Wernig; Alexander Meissner; Ruth Foreman; Tobias Brambrink; Manching Ku; Konrad Hochedlinger; Bradley E Bernstein; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  191 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Induced pluripotent stem cells--opportunities for disease modelling and drug discovery.

Authors:  Marica Grskovic; Ashkan Javaherian; Berta Strulovici; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Mechanism and methods to induce pluripotency.

Authors:  Peizhe Wang; Jie Na
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Efficient reprogramming of adult neural stem cells to monocytes by ectopic expression of a single gene.

Authors:  Magda Forsberg; Marie Carlén; Konstantinos Meletis; Maggie S Y Yeung; Fanie Barnabé-Heider; Mats A A Persson; Johan Aarum; Jonas Frisén
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Epigenetic stability increases extensively during Drosophila follicle stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Andrew D Skora; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Differentiation of neural-crest-derived intermediate pluripotent progenitors into committed periodontal populations involves unique molecular signature changes, cohort shifts, and epigenetic modifications.

Authors:  Smit Jayant Dangaria; Yoshihiro Ito; Xianghong Luan; Thomas G H Diekwisch
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 7.  Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues.

Authors:  Jacob H Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Mechanisms underlying the formation of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Federico González; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.814

10.  Tankyrase inhibition promotes a stable human naïve pluripotent state with improved functionality.

Authors:  Ludovic Zimmerlin; Tea Soon Park; Jeffrey S Huo; Karan Verma; Sarshan R Pather; C Conover Talbot; Jasmin Agarwal; Diana Steppan; Yang W Zhang; Michael Considine; Hong Guo; Xiufeng Zhong; Christian Gutierrez; Leslie Cope; M Valeria Canto-Soler; Alan D Friedman; Stephen B Baylin; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.