Literature DB >> 24482619

Early results of sacro-iliac joint fixation following long fusion to the sacrum in adult spine deformity.

Josh E Schroeder1, Matthew E Cunningham1, Tom Ross2, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sacro-iliac joint (SIJ) is the largest joint in the human body. When the lumbar spine is fused to the sacrum, motion across the SIJ is increased, leading to increased degeneration of the SIJ. Degeneration can become symptomatic in up to 75% of the cases when a long lumbar fusion ends with a sacral fixation. If medical treatments fail, patients can undergo surgical fixation of the SIJ. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study reports the results of short-term complications, length of stay, and clinical as well as radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous SIJ fixation for SIJ pain following long fusions to the sacrum for adult scoliosis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all the patients who underwent a percutaneous fixation of the SIJ after corrective scoliosis surgery was performed in a single specialized scoliosis center between the years 2011-2013. Ten SIJ fusions were performed in six patients who failed conservative care for SIJ arthritis. Average age was 50 (range 25-60 years). The patients were 15.3 years in average after the original surgical procedure (range 4-25 years). Average post-operative follow-up was 10.25 months (range 15-4 months). The medical charts of the patients were reviewed for hospital stay, complications, pre- and post-operative pain, quality of life, and satisfaction with surgery using the visual analogues score (VAS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)22 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires. Images were reviewed for fixation of the SIJ, fusion, and deviation of the implants from the SIJ.
RESULTS: There were no complications in surgery or post-operatively. Discharge was on post-operative day 2 (range 1-4 days). Leg VAS score improved from 6.5 to 2.0 (P < 0.005; minimal clinically important difference (MCID) 1.6). Back VAS score decreased from 7.83 to 2.67 mm (P < 0.005; MCID 1.2). ODI scores dropped from 22.2 to 10.5 (P = 0.0005; MCID 12.4). SRS22 scores increased from 2.93 to 3.65 (P = 0.035; MCID 0.2) with the largest increases in the pain, function, and satisfaction domains of the questionnaires.
CONCLUSION: Fixation of the SIJ in patients that fail conservative care for SIJ arthritis after long fusions ending in the sacrum provides a reduction in back pain and improved quality of life in the short and medium range follow-up period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SI joint fusion; iFuse; joint fusion; sacro–iliac joint; scoliosis; spine deformity

Year:  2013        PMID: 24482619      PMCID: PMC3903954          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-013-9374-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sacroiliac joint interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hans C Hansen; Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown; Steven P Cohen; John R Swicegood; James D Colson; Laxmaiah Manchikanti
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases.

Authors:  F Denis; S Davis; T Comfort
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; A Aivaliklis; F Pfefer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; C A Planchon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Minimum 5-year analysis of L5-S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Kuniyoshi Tsuchiya; Keith H Bridwell; Timothy R Kuklo; Lawrence G Lenke; Christine Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Jun-Seok Lee; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Outcome of percutaneous sacroiliac joint fixation with porous plasma-coated triangular titanium implants: an independent review.

Authors:  Jong T Kim; Leonard M Rudolf; John A Glaser
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-02-22

10.  Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis-MIS Technique with Titanium Implants: Report of the First 50 Patients and Outcomes.

Authors:  Leonard Rudolf
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-30
View more
  32 in total

1.  A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Authors:  Jake Heiney; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-22

2.  Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Fabien Bitan; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Daniel Cher; Travis Hillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-20

3.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.

Authors:  Katie Spain; Timothy Holt
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-19

6.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

7.  Sacroiliac joint pain: is the medical world aware enough of its existence? Why not considering sacroiliac joint fusion in the recalcitrant cases?

Authors:  Vicente Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha; Nieves Sáiz-Sapena; Leyre Vanaclocha
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

8.  Biomechanical Stability of the Sacroiliac Joint with Differing Implant Configurations in a Synthetic Model.

Authors:  Andrew L Freeman; Joan E Bechtold; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-10-08

9.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23

10.  Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Lucas Haase; Paul A Lender; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.