Literature DB >> 15761709

Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks.

J Y Maigne1, C A Planchon.   

Abstract

Low back pain persisting or appearing after a technically successful lumbar fusion challenges clinicians. In this context, the sacroiliac joint could be a possible source of pain, but the frequency of its responsibility is not really known. We used sacroiliac anesthetic blocks, the gold standard for diagnosis, to determine this frequency. Our second goal was to search predictive factors for a positive block. Our prospective series consisted of 40 patients with persistent low back pain after a technically successful fusion who received a sacroiliac anesthetic block under fluoroscopic control. The diagnostic criterion was a relief of more than 75% of the pain on a visual analog scale. We found a 35% rate of positive blocks. The only criterion that characterized these patients was a postoperative pain different from the preoperative pain in its distribution ( p =0.017). A free interval of more than 3 months between surgery and appearance of the pain had an indicative value ( p =0.17). An increased uptake in the sacroiliac on bone scintigraphy or a past history of posterior iliac bone-graft harvesting had no significant value ( p =0.74 and p =1.0, respectively). The sacroiliac joint is a possible source of pain after lumbar fusion. The anesthetic block under fluoroscopic control remains the gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15761709      PMCID: PMC3489225          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0692-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar disc changes below scoliosis fusions. A prospective study.

Authors:  R A Balderston; T J Albert; T McIntosh; L Wong; C Dolinskas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The value of radionuclide imaging in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndrome.

Authors:  C W Slipman; E B Sterenfeld; L H Chou; R Herzog; E Vresilovic
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; A Aivaliklis; F Pfefer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.

Authors:  P Fritzell; O Hägg; P Wessberg; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A C Schwarzer; C N Aprill; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Bone SPECT of the back after lumbar surgery.

Authors:  G F Gates; R J McDonald
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  Computed tomographic findings in patients with persistent sacroiliac pain after posterior iliac graft harvesting.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; H Elgafy; H B Semaan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion.

Authors:  P Axelsson; R Johnsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Y Shono; K Kaneda; K Abumi; P C McAfee; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Value of quantitative radionuclide bone scanning in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndrome in 32 patients with low back pain.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; H Boulahdour; G Chatellier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  37 in total

1.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Authors:  Jake Heiney; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-22

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2005.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Daisuke Kurosawa; Takako Nishi; Keisuke Ito; Daijiro Morimoto; Yoshiro Musha; Hiroshi Ozawa; Eiichi Murakami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 6.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

7.  Influence of age and sagittal balance of the spine on the value of the pelvic incidence.

Authors:  Legaye Jean
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Lingutla; Raymond Pollock; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Concepts of in-patient gradual diagnostics for patients with lumbar back-pain].

Authors:  R Kayser; K Mahlfeld; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.