Literature DB >> 27162715

Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Bradley S Duhon1, Fabien Bitan2, Harry Lockstadt3, Don Kovalsky4, Daniel Cher5, Travis Hillen6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is an underdiagnosed condition. Several published cohorts have reported favorable mid-term outcomes after SIJ fusion using titanium implants placed across the SIJ. Herein we report long-term (24-month) results from a prospective multicenter clinical trial.
METHODS: One hundred and seventy-two subjects at 26 US sites with SI joint dysfunction were enrolled and underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants. Subjects underwent structured assessments preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively, including SIJ pain ratings (0-100 visual analog scale), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D), and patient satisfaction. Adverse events were collected throughout follow-up. All participating patients underwent a high-resolution pelvic CT scan at 1 year.
RESULTS: Mean subject age was 50.9 years and 69.8% were women. SIJ pain was present for an average of 5.1 years prior to surgical treatment. SIJ pain decreased from 79.8 at baseline to 30.4 at 12 months and remained low at 26.0 at 24 months (p<.0001 for change from baseline). ODI decreased from 55.2 at baseline to 31.5 at 12 months and remained low at 30.9 at 24 months (p<.0001 for change from baseline). Quality of life (SF-36 and EQ-5D) improvements seen at 12 months were sustained at 24 months. The proportion of subjects taking opioids for SIJ or low back pain decreased from 76.2% at baseline to 55.0% at 24 months (p <.0001). To date, 8 subjects (4.7%) have undergone one or more revision SIJ surgeries. 7 device-related adverse events occurred. CT scan at one year showed a high rate (97%) of bone adherence to at least 2 implants on both the iliac and sacral sides with modest rates of bone growth across the SIJ.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with SIJ dysfunction, minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular titanium implants showed marked improvements in pain, disability and quality of life at 2 years. Imaging showed that bone apposition to implants was common but radiographic evidence of intraarticular fusion within the joint may take more than 1 year in many patients. This prospective multicenter clinical trial was approved by local or regional IRBs at each center prior to first patient enrollment. Informed consent with IRB-approved study-specific consent forms was obtained from all patients prior to participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  degenerative sacroiliitis; multicenter clinical trial; sacroiliac joint disruptions; sacroiliac joint dysfunction; sacroiliac joint fusion

Year:  2016        PMID: 27162715      PMCID: PMC4852595          DOI: 10.14444/3013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  68 in total

1.  A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  Nilesh Patel; Andrew Gross; Lora Brown; Gennady Gekht
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; Kee D Kim; Michael S Hisey; Gregory A Hoffman; Hyun W Bae; Steven E Gaede; Ralph F Rashbaum; Pierce Dalton Nunley; Daniel L Peterson; John K Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-09-06

4.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; David R Flum; Thomas M Wickizer; Patrick J Heagerty; Alex F Lenkoski; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  The ability of multi-site, multi-depth sacral lateral branch blocks to anesthetize the sacroiliac joint complex.

Authors:  Paul Dreyfuss; Troy Henning; Niriksha Malladi; Barry Goldstein; Nikolai Bogduk
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  One-year outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for discogenic back pain: a community-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; Brook I Martin; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Jun-Seok Lee; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  One year successful outcomes for novel sacroiliac joint arthrodesis system.

Authors:  Donald Sachs; Robyn Capobianco
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2012-12-27

10.  Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Arnold Graham Smith; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher; Leonard Rudolf; Donald Sachs; Mukund Gundanna; Jeffrey Kleiner; Milan G Mody; A Nick Shamie
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2013-10-30
View more
  41 in total

1.  Physiological in vitro sacroiliac joint motion: a study on three-dimensional posterior pelvic ring kinematics.

Authors:  Niels Hammer; Mario Scholze; Thomas Kibsgård; Stefan Klima; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Ronny Grunert
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Authors:  Nikolai G Rainov; Reinhard Schneiderhan; Volkmar Heidecke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical analysis of the number of implants for the immediate sacroiliac joint fixation.

Authors:  Roxanne Dubé-Cyr; Carl-Éric Aubin; Isabelle Villemure; Pierre-Jean Arnoux
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  Editor's Introduction: Update on Current Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures: Implications for Appropriate Current Procedural Terminology Medical Coding.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

6.  Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.

Authors:  Katie Spain; Timothy Holt
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

8.  Fortifying the Bone-Implant Interface Part 2: An In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed and TPS-Coated Triangular Implants.

Authors:  Regina F MacBarb; Derek P Lindsey; Shane A Woods; Peggy A Lalor; Mukund I Gundanna; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Sacroiliac joint pain: is the medical world aware enough of its existence? Why not considering sacroiliac joint fusion in the recalcitrant cases?

Authors:  Vicente Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha; Nieves Sáiz-Sapena; Leyre Vanaclocha
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

10.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.