Literature DB >> 26273558

A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Jake Heiney1, Robyn Capobianco2, Daniel Cher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have been published regarding minimally invasive surgical (MIS) fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint using a lateral transarticular approach. Herein we report a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize operative measures and clinical outcomes reported in published studies of MIS SI joint fusion.
METHODS: The systematic review was done according to PRISMA standards. PubMed and EMBASE were searched using the terms sacroiliac joint AND fusion. Original peer-reviewed articles in the English language that reported clinical outcomes on at least 5 cases of MIS SI joint fusion using a lateral transarticular approach were included. Random effects meta-analysis (RMA) was performed on selected variables using the DerSimonian and Laird method, including operative measures, VAS SI joint pain ratings (0-10 scale) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed. Other findings were summarized qualitatively.
RESULTS: A total of 18 articles met the inclusion criteria. After accounting for overlapping cohorts, 12 unique cohorts from 4 countries were extracted for a total of 432 subjects. The RMA mean (range) was 59 minutes (27-78) for procedure time, 36.9cc (10-70) for estimated blood loss and 1.7 days (range 0-7) for length of stay (LOS). The RMA mean [95% CI] pain score dropped by 5.2 points at 6 months and 5.3 points at 12 months (baseline score of 8.1 [7.8-8.4], 12-month score of 2.7 [2.1-3.3]), and a 24-month score of 2.0(1.4-2.5). ODI decreased by 31 points at 12 months (baseline score of 56.2 [51.0-61.5], 6-month score of 30.7 [21.8-39.6], and 12-month score of 25.1 [12.3-37.9]). Some estimates showed significant variation across studies and between the types of implants used. Other reported outcomes were supportive of the positive effects of SI joint fusion.
CONCLUSION: Published studies of MIS SI joint fusion using a lateral transarticular approach confirm its minimally invasive characteristics with minimal blood loss and short operating room times, and show consistent, rapid, sustained and clinically important improvements in patient reported SI joint pain, disability and quality of life scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; degenerative sacroiliitis; meta-analysis; sacroiliac joint disruption; sacroiliac joint dysfunction; sacroiliac joint fusion; systematic review

Year:  2015        PMID: 26273558      PMCID: PMC4528567          DOI: 10.14444/2040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  54 in total

1.  Sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic pain: a simple technique avoiding the use of metalwork.

Authors:  K A Giannikas; A M Khan; M T Karski; H A Maxwell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new technique.

Authors:  Christopher L Wise; Bruce E Dall
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-12

3.  The ability of multi-site, multi-depth sacral lateral branch blocks to anesthetize the sacroiliac joint complex.

Authors:  Paul Dreyfuss; Troy Henning; Niriksha Malladi; Barry Goldstein; Nikolai Bogduk
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Curtis W Slipman; Carl H Shin; Rajeev K Patel; Zacharia Isaac; Chris W Huston; Jason S Lipetz; David A Lenrow; Debra L Braverman; Edward J Vresilovic
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Jun-Seok Lee; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  One year successful outcomes for novel sacroiliac joint arthrodesis system.

Authors:  Donald Sachs; Robyn Capobianco
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2012-12-27

7.  Evaluation of a minimally invasive procedure for sacroiliac joint fusion - an in vitro biomechanical analysis of initial and cycled properties.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Luis Perez-Orribo; Nestor Rodriguez-Martinez; Phillip M Reyes; Anna Newcomb; Alexandria Cable; Grace Hickam; Scott A Yerby; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-05-15

8.  ISASS policy statement - minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio; Ralph Rashbaum
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Dual fibular allograft dowel technique for sacroiliac joint arthrodesis.

Authors:  Robert A McGuire; Zenggan Chen; Kevin Donahoe
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-08

10.  Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Cheng-Lun Soo
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-12-13
View more
  24 in total

1.  Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Ali Kiapour; Scott A Yerby; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

2.  Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Authors:  David Polly; Daniel Cher; Peter G Whang; Clay Frank; Jonathan Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-21

3.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Obstructed spinopelvic fixation in the setting of a triangular titanium sacroiliac fusion implant: a case description.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; James D Lin; Jamal N Shillingford; Nathan E Hardy; Hemant Reddy; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

7.  Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.

Authors:  Bengt Sturesson; Djaya Kools; Robert Pflugmacher; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Domenico Prestamburgo; Julius Dengler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical Stability of the Sacroiliac Joint with Differing Implant Configurations in a Synthetic Model.

Authors:  Andrew L Freeman; Joan E Bechtold; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 9.  The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aazad Abbas; Jin Tong Du; Jay Toor; Anne Versteeg; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.721

10.  Mini-open sacroiliac joint fusion with direct bone grafting and minimally invasive fixation using intraoperative navigation.

Authors:  Andrew W Cleveland; Derek T Nhan; Michelle Akiyama; Christopher J Kleck; Andriy Noshchenko; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.