Literature DB >> 18469692

Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.

Kee-Yong Ha1, Jun-Seok Lee, Ki-Won Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cause-effect relationship between fusion and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion has attracted considerable attention. However, little attention has been paid to the SIJ, which is one of the adjacent joints.
METHODS: This study prospectively examined 37 patients, who underwent instrumented posterolateral lumbar/lumbosacral fusion from July 1997 to October 1998. Among them, 32 patients were included in this study and defined as the fusion group (male/female: 10/22, mean age: 64 years). The fusion group was divided into 2 subgroups according to the range of fusion. Group 1 had floating fusion (fusion to L5) and included 22 patients (male/female: 7/15, mean age: 65.6 years). Group 2 had fixed fusion (fusion to S1) and included 10 patients (male/female: 3/7, mean age: 60.5 years). Thirty-four age-matched normal individuals (male/female: 18/16, mean age: 64.5 years) were recruited as a control group. SIJ degeneration was assessed by confirming the absence of degeneration in the SIJ by computed tomography scans before surgery and 2 weeks after surgery. The SIJ was evaluated again by taking computed tomography scans at 1 year and 5 years after surgery. The incidence of SIJ degeneration was evaluated and compared (fusion group vs. control group; group 1 vs. group 2). The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scales (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before surgery and at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: The incidence of SIJ degeneration in the fusion group was 75% (24/32), which was significantly higher than that of the control Group 38.2% (13/34) (P < 0.05). The incidence of SIJ degeneration (bilateral and unilateral) and bilateral SIJ degeneration was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (P = 0.028 and 0.04, respectively). The incidence of SIJ degeneration was not associated with the number of fusion segments. At the 5-year follow-up, the patients in groups 1 and 2 reported significant improvements in the VAS and ODI scores compared with the preoperative scores. However, there was no significant difference in the decrease in VAS and ODI scores between the 2 groups (P = 0.145 and 0.278, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Instrumented posterolateral lumbar/lumbosacral fusion can be a cause of SIJ degeneration. SIJ degeneration develops more often in patients undergoing lumbosacral fusion regardless of the number of fusion segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18469692     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  60 in total

1.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Authors:  Jake Heiney; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-22

3.  Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Authors:  David Polly; Daniel Cher; Peter G Whang; Clay Frank; Jonathan Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Fabien Bitan; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Daniel Cher; Travis Hillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-20

5.  Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region.

Authors:  Roberto Postacchini; Guido Trasimeni; Francesca Ripani; Pasquale Sessa; Stefano Perotti; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Lumbosacral stress and age may contribute to increased pelvic incidence: an analysis of 1625 adults.

Authors:  Hongda Bao; Barthelemy Liabaud; Jeffrey Varghese; Renaud Lafage; Bassel G Diebo; Cyrus Jalai; Subaraman Ramchandran; Gregory Poorman; Thomas Errico; Feng Zhu; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Peter Passias; Aaron Buckland; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effect of lordosis angle change after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion on sacrum angular displacement: a finite element study.

Authors:  Ningfang Mao; Jian Shi; Dawei He; Yang Xie; Yushu Bai; Xianzhao Wei; Zhicai Shi; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Ki-Ho Na; Jin-Hyok Kim; Ho-Yeon Jeong; Dong-Gune Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Thoracic disc herniation of the adjacent segment with acutely progressing myelopathy.

Authors:  In-Soo Oh; Jun-Yeong Seo; Kee-Yong Ha; Yoon-Chung Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-26

10.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.