Literature DB >> 24482000

Dose reduction in standard head CT: first results from a new scanner using iterative reconstruction and a new detector type in comparison with two previous generations of multi-slice CT.

C Ozdoba1, J Slotboom, G Schroth, S Ulzheimer, R Kottke, H Watzal, C Weisstanner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) accounts for more than half of the total radiation exposure from medical procedures, which makes dose reduction in CT an effective means of reducing radiation exposure. We analysed the dose reduction that can be achieved with a new CT scanner [Somatom Edge (E)] that incorporates new developments in hardware (detector) and software (iterative reconstruction).
METHODS: We compared weighted volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose length product (DLP) values of 25 consecutive patients studied with non-enhanced standard brain CT with the new scanner and with two previous models each, a 64-slice 64-row multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner with 64 rows (S64) and a 16-slice 16-row MDCT scanner with 16 rows (S16). We analysed signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in images from the three scanners and performed a quality rating by three neuroradiologists to analyse whether dose reduction techniques still yield sufficient diagnostic quality.
RESULTS: CTDI(Vol) of scanner E was 41.5 and 36.4 % less than the values of scanners S16 and S64, respectively; the DLP values were 40 and 38.3 % less. All differences were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were best in S64; these differences also reached statistical significance. Image analysis, however, showed "non-inferiority" of scanner E regarding image quality.
CONCLUSIONS: The first experience with the new scanner shows that new dose reduction techniques allow for up to 40 % dose reduction while still maintaining image quality at a diagnostically usable level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24482000      PMCID: PMC3936131          DOI: 10.1007/s00062-013-0263-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Michael H Lev; Peter Bove; Cara E O'Reilly; Sanjay Saini; James T Rhea; James H Thrall; George J Hunter; Leena M Hamberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection.

Authors:  A Korn; M Fenchel; B Bender; S Danz; T K Hauser; D Ketelsen; T Flohr; C D Claussen; M Heuschmid; U Ernemann; H Brodoefel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diagnostic reference levels from the ACR CT Accreditation Program.

Authors:  Cynthia McCollough; Theresa Branham; Vince Herlihy; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Lavonne Robbins; Krista Bush; Michael McNitt-Gray; J Thomas Payne; Tom Ruckdeschel; Doug Pfeiffer; Dianna Cody; Robert Zeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Implementation of an accelerated iterative algorithm for cone-beam SPECT.

Authors:  J Li; R J Jaszczak; K L Greer; R E Coleman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they?

Authors:  Walter Huda; Fred A Mettler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Intraindividual evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction and filter kernel on subjective and objective image quality in computed tomography of the brain.

Authors:  J H Buhk; A Laqmani; H C von Schultzendorff; D Hammerle; S Sehner; G Adam; J Fiehler; H D Nagel; M Regier
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2013-07-30
  6 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  Lukas Blumrich; João Paulo Mota Telles; Saul Almeida da Silva; Ricardo Ferrareto Iglesio; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Potential of combining iterative reconstruction with noise efficient detector design: aggressive dose reduction in head CT.

Authors:  H Brodoefel; B Bender; C Schabel; M Fenchel; U Ernemann; A Korn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of the use of automatic exposure control and automatic tube potential selection in low-dose cerebrospinal fluid shunt head CT.

Authors:  Adam N Wallace; Ross Vyhmeister; Swapnil Bagade; Arindam Chatterjee; Brandon Hicks; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; Robert C McKinstry
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Evaluation of whole body Ultralow-Dose CT for the assessment of ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications: an experimental ex-vivo study in a swine model.

Authors:  Ahmed Othman; Hussam A Hamou; Rastislav Pjontek; Saif Afat; Hans Clusmann; Martin Wiesmann; Marc A Brockmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Distribution of radiation exposure in patients with partially stable and unstable pelvic ring fractures: first-time use of highly accurate assessment by Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  Jakob C F Gunneweg; Georgios F Giannakopoulos; Wietse P Zuidema; Niels A A Matheijssen; Ferco H Berger
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Task-driven optimization of the non-spectral mode of photon counting CT for intracranial hemorrhage assessment.

Authors:  Xu Ji; Ran Zhang; Guang-Hong Chen; Ke Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Image Quality of 3rd Generation Spiral Cranial Dual-Source CT in Combination with an Advanced Model Iterative Reconstruction Technique: A Prospective Intra-Individual Comparison Study to Standard Sequential Cranial CT Using Identical Radiation Dose.

Authors:  Holger Wenz; Máté E Maros; Mathias Meyer; Alex Förster; Holger Haubenreisser; Stefan Kurth; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Flohr; Christianne Leidecker; Christoph Groden; Johann Scharf; Thomas Henzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Intra-individual diagnostic image quality and organ-specific-radiation dose comparison between spiral cCT with iterative image reconstruction and z-axis automated tube current modulation and sequential cCT.

Authors:  Holger Wenz; Máté E Maros; Mathias Meyer; Joshua Gawlitza; Alex Förster; Holger Haubenreisser; Stefan Kurth; Stefan O Schoenberg; Christoph Groden; Thomas Henzler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.