Literature DB >> 24476021

Regionalization and local hospital closure in Norwegian maternity care--the effect on neonatal and infant mortality.

Jostein Grytten1, Lars Monkerud, Irene Skau, Rune Sørensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether neonatal and infant mortality, after adjustments for differences in case mix, were independent of the type of hospital in which the delivery was carried out. DATA: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway provided detailed medical information for all births in Norway. STUDY
DESIGN: Hospitals were classified into two groups: local hospitals/maternity clinics versus central/regional hospitals. Outcomes were neonatal and infant mortality. The data were analyzed using propensity score weighting to make adjustments for differences in case mix between the two groups of hospitals. This analysis was supplemented with analyses of 13 local hospitals that were closed. Using a difference-in-difference approach, the effects that these closures had on neonatal and infant mortality were estimated. PRINCIPAL FINDING: Neonatal and infant mortality were not affected by the type of hospital where the delivery took place.
CONCLUSION: A regionalized maternity service does not lead to increased neonatal and infant mortality. This is mainly because high-risk deliveries were identified well in advance of the birth, and referred to a larger hospital with sufficient perinatal resources to deal with these deliveries. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Program evaluation; determinants of health; obstetrics/gynecology; risk adjustment for clinical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24476021      PMCID: PMC4239845          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  30 in total

1.  Does size matter? A population-based study of birth in lower volume maternity hospitals for low risk women.

Authors:  Sally K Tracy; Elizabeth Sullivan; Hannah Dahlen; Deborah Black; Yueping Alex Wang; Mark B Tracy
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  Development of regionalized perinatal care.

Authors:  Victor Y H Yu; Peter M Dunn
Journal:  Semin Neonatol       Date:  2004-04

3.  Regionalized perinatal care in North America.

Authors:  Herman A Hein
Journal:  Semin Neonatol       Date:  2004-04

Review 4.  Regionalization of perinatal care in Europe.

Authors:  Jennifer Zeitlin; Emile Papiernik; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Semin Neonatol       Date:  2004-04

5.  Rural community hospitals and factors correlated with their risk of closing.

Authors:  R M Mullner; R J Rydman; D G Whiteis; R F Rich
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Relation between size of delivery unit and neonatal death in low risk deliveries: population based study.

Authors:  D Moster; R T Lie; T Markestad
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Birth outcomes by level of obstetric care in Finland: a catchment area based analysis.

Authors:  K Viisainen; M Gissler; E Hemminki
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The relation of obstetrical volume and nursery level to perinatal mortality.

Authors:  J A Mayfield; R A Rosenblatt; L M Baldwin; J Chu; J P Logerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The relationship between neonatal mortality and hospital level.

Authors:  M LeFevre; L Sanner; S Anderson; R Tsutakawa
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Safety and place of birth in Scotland.

Authors:  S K Cole; A Macfarlane
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Kevin McCartney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Reem Saleem Malouf; Claire Tomlinson; Jane Henderson; Charles Opondo; Peter Brocklehurst; Fiona Alderdice; Angaja Phalguni; Janine Dretzke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Does the use of Doppler ultrasound reduce fetal mortality? A population study of all deliveries in Norway 1990-2014.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  The effect of concentrating obstetrics services in fewer hospitals on patient access: a simulation.

Authors:  Soichi Koike; Masatoshi Matsumoto; Hiroo Ide; Saori Kashima; Hidenao Atarashi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Mario Rüdiger; Jochen Schmitt; Felix Walther; Denise Kuester; Anja Bieber; Jürgen Malzahn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.