Literature DB >> 16256714

Regionalized perinatal care in North America.

Herman A Hein1.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to familiarize the reader with the status of regionalized perinatal health care in North America, and specifically in the United States of America, using the Iowa regionalization model. The evolution of the regionalization movement in the late 1960s and early 1970s is reviewed. It is noted that the movement was largely without federal government intervention. The role of the March of Dimes in developing the first set of so-called national guidelines is chronicled. The Iowa model, utilizing some non-tertiary referral centres, is discussed in depth. This model included extensive outreach education for the entire state, and worked well largely because of the lack of competition to the major university teaching hospital located at the University of Iowa in Iowa City. This was not true for many other states and regions because competition did exist between tertiary centres. The impact of managed care systems on the overall role of regionalization is discussed. Suggestions are offered for controlling the impact of third-party payers (managed care) on the quality of perinatal health care. An idealized system of monitoring the impact of regionalization and monitoring the effect of managed care is detailed. Finally, the future of regionalization is discussed in the face of deregionalization in populous areas. The need for the best possible care as close to patients' homes as possible (regionalization) still seems apparent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16256714     DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2003.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Neonatol        ISSN: 1084-2756


  7 in total

1.  Perinatal periods of risk: phase 2 analytic methods for further investigating feto-infant mortality.

Authors:  William M Sappenfield; Magda G Peck; Carol S Gilbert; Vera R Haynatzka; Thomas Bryant
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-11

2.  The impact of hospital obstetric volume on maternal outcomes in term, non-low-birthweight pregnancies.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Yvonne W Cheng; Cathy L Emeis; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Regionalization and local hospital closure in Norwegian maternity care--the effect on neonatal and infant mortality.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Infants born at the threshold of viability in relation to neonatal mortality: Colorado, 1991 to 2003.

Authors:  B D Kamath; T L Box; M Simpson; J A Hernández
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Organisation of obstetric services for very preterm births in Europe: results from the MOSAIC project.

Authors:  B Blondel; E Papiernik; D Delmas; W Künzel; T Weber; R F Maier; L Kollée; J Zeitlin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?

Authors:  Nathan T Walton; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Impact of regionalisation and case-volume on neonatal and perinatal mortality: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Jochen Schmitt; Stefanie Deckert; Felix Walther; Denise Bianca Küster; Anja Bieber; Mario Rüdiger; Jürgen Malzahn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.