Literature DB >> 10212086

Relation between size of delivery unit and neonatal death in low risk deliveries: population based study.

D Moster1, R T Lie, T Markestad.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine risk of neonatal death after low risk pregnancies in relation to size of delivery units.
METHODS: A population based study of live born singleton infants in Norway with birthweights of at least 2500 g was carried out. Antenatal risk factors were adjusted for.
RESULTS: From 1972 to 1995, 1.25 million births fulfilled the criteria. The neonatal death rate was lowest for maternity units with 2001-3000 annual births and steadily increased with decreasing size of the maternity unit to around twice that for units with less than 100 births a year (odds ratio 2.1; 95 % confidence interval 1.6 to 2.8). Institutions with more than 3000 deliveries a year also had a higher rate (odds ratio 1.7; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), but analyses suggest that this rate is overestimated.
CONCLUSION: Around 2000 to 3000 annual births are needed to reduce the risk of neonatal deaths after low risk deliveries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10212086      PMCID: PMC1720939          DOI: 10.1136/fn.80.3.f221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  16 in total

1.  The safety of small maternity hospitals in Victoria 1982-84.

Authors:  J Lumley
Journal:  Community Health Stud       Date:  1988

2.  The choice of place of delivery. Effect of hospital level on mortality in all singleton births in New York City.

Authors:  N Paneth; J L Kiely; S Wallenstein; M Susser
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1987-01

3.  Do obstetric intranatal interventions make birth safer?

Authors:  M Tew
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-07

4.  Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; J Reinken; P Shoemack
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Perinatal mortality distributed by type of hospital in the Central Hospital District of Helsinki, Finland.

Authors:  E Hemminki
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1985

Review 6.  The maximin strategy in modern obstetrics.

Authors:  H Brody; J R Thompson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Marital status as a risk factor for fetal and infant mortality.

Authors:  A Arntzen; T Moum; P Magnus; L S Bakketeig
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1996-03

8.  The relation of obstetrical volume and nursery level to perinatal mortality.

Authors:  J A Mayfield; R A Rosenblatt; L M Baldwin; J Chu; J P Logerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality.

Authors:  C S Phibbs; J M Bronstein; E Buxton; R H Phibbs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The quality of obstetric care in family practice: are family physicians as safe as obstetricians?

Authors:  M B Mengel; W R Phillips
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  11 in total

1.  Regionalization and local hospital closure in Norwegian maternity care--the effect on neonatal and infant mortality.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Kevin McCartney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Obstetrical volume and early neonatal mortality in preterm infants.

Authors:  Dorothee B Bartels; Paul Wenzlaff; Christian F Poets
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  The association between hospital obstetric volume and perinatal outcomes in California.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Yvonne W Cheng; Caitlin P Kontgis; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Distance matters: a population based study examining access to maternity services for rural women.

Authors:  Stefan Grzybowski; Kathrin Stoll; Jude Kornelsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care.

Authors:  Marisja Scheerhagen; Henk F van Stel; Dominique J C Tholhuijsen; Erwin Birnie; Arie Franx; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Impact of shortened length of stay for delivery on the required bed capacity in maternity services: results from forecast analysis on administrative data.

Authors:  Mélanie Lefèvre; Koen Van den Heede; Cécile Camberlin; Nicolas Bouckaert; Claire Beguin; Carl Devos; Carine Van de Voorde
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The impact on neonatal mortality of shifting childbirth services among levels of hospitals: Taiwan's experience.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Sylvia H Hsu; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  S I Watson; W Arulampalam; S Petrou; N Marlow; A S Morgan; E S Draper; S Santhakumaran; N Modi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Kevin McCartney; Kim Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.