Literature DB >> 7964341

Birth outcomes by level of obstetric care in Finland: a catchment area based analysis.

K Viisainen1, M Gissler, E Hemminki.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To study whether hospitals of different levels are equally safe places to give birth in a regionalised system of care.
DESIGN: This was a population based, cross sectional survey comparing birth outcomes in nationwide catchment areas of different levels of hospital care. All women and low risk women were examined separately. SETTING AND
SUBJECTS: The study population comprised all women who gave birth in Finland in 1987-88. The data were obtained from the Finnish Medical Registry, complemented by official data. MAIN
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in crude or birthweight specific perinatal mortality rates between the catchment areas, nor did the other outcomes studied favour tertiary care compared with other levels of care in the area based analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In a regionalised system of birth care with a proper referral system, small local hospitals are as safe places to give birth as tertiary care hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964341      PMCID: PMC1059991          DOI: 10.1136/jech.48.4.400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  16 in total

1.  Mother's education and perinatal problems in Finland.

Authors:  E Hemminki; J Meriläinen; M Malin; O Rahkonen; J Teperi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Need for and influence of feedback from the Finnish birth register to data providers.

Authors:  E Hemminki; J Teperi; K Tuominen
Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care       Date:  1992-06

3.  Regional perinatal mortality and regional hospitalization at delivery in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P E Treffers; R Laan
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-07

Review 4.  Place of delivery: a review.

Authors:  R Campbell; A MacFarlane
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-07

5.  Two geographically defined populations with different organization of medical care. Cause-specific analysis of early neonatal deaths.

Authors:  R Eksmyr
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1986-01

6.  Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; J Reinken; P Shoemack
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Obstetric practice in Finland, 1950-1980. Changes in technology and its relation to health.

Authors:  E Hemminki
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Perinatal mortality distributed by type of hospital in the Central Hospital District of Helsinki, Finland.

Authors:  E Hemminki
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1985

9.  The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states.

Authors:  S Gortmaker; A Sobol; C Clark; D K Walker; A Geronimus
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study.

Authors:  N Paneth; J L Kiely; S Wallenstein; M Marcus; J Pakter; M Susser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Ann Kelly; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications.

Authors:  Kathy L Kyser; Xin Lu; Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Stephen K Hunter; Alison G Cahill; Peter Cram
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Regionalization and local hospital closure in Norwegian maternity care--the effect on neonatal and infant mortality.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Does having cesarean section capability make a difference to a small rural maternity service?

Authors:  Nancy Lynch; Harvey Thommasen; Nancy Anderson; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Effect of hospital setting and volume on clinical outcomes in women with gestational and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  W K Nicholson; F Witter; N R Powe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Cultures of risk and their influence on birth in rural British Columbia.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 7.  Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Kevin McCartney; Kim Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  The impact of level of neonatal care provision on outcomes for preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks of gestation, or with a birth weight between 1000 and 1500 g: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Abdul Qader Tahir Ismail; Elaine M Boyle; Thillagavathie Pillay
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-03-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.