Literature DB >> 24469398

53BP1, BRCA1, and the choice between recombination and end joining at DNA double-strand breaks.

James M Daley1, Patrick Sung.   

Abstract

When DNA double-strand breaks occur, the cell cycle stage has a major influence on the choice of the repair pathway employed. Specifically, nonhomologous end joining is the predominant mechanism used in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, while homologous recombination becomes fully activated in S phase. Studies over the past 2 decades have revealed that the aberrant joining of replication-associated breaks leads to catastrophic genome rearrangements, revealing an important role of DNA break repair pathway choice in the preservation of genome integrity. 53BP1, first identified as a DNA damage checkpoint protein, and BRCA1, a well-known breast cancer tumor suppressor, are at the center of this choice. Research on how these proteins function at the DNA break site has advanced rapidly in the recent past. Here, we review what is known regarding how the repair pathway choice is made, including the mechanisms that govern the recruitment of each critical factor, and how the cell transitions from end joining in G1 to homologous recombination in S/G2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469398      PMCID: PMC3993578          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01639-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  103 in total

1.  DNA damage-dependent nuclear dynamics of the Mre11 complex.

Authors:  O K Mirzoeva; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Matthew J Neale; Jing Pan; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  BRCA1 ubiquitinates its phosphorylation-dependent binding partner CtIP.

Authors:  Xiaochun Yu; Shuang Fu; Maoyi Lai; Richard Baer; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes.

Authors:  Roger A Greenberg; Bijan Sobhian; Shailja Pathania; Sharon B Cantor; Yoshihiro Nakatani; David M Livingston
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  CtIP activates its own and cyclin D1 promoters via the E2F/RB pathway during G1/S progression.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  DNA joint dependence of pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  James M Daley; Renee L Vander Laan; Aswathi Suresh; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair.

Authors:  Maria Victoria Botuyan; Joseph Lee; Irene M Ward; Ja-Eun Kim; James R Thompson; Junjie Chen; Georges Mer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Grant S Stewart; Bin Wang; Colin R Bignell; A Malcolm R Taylor; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle.

Authors:  Yael Aylon; Batia Liefshitz; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; Achille Pellicioli; Alitukiriza Balijja; Xuan Wang; Simona Fiorani; Walter Carotenuto; Giordano Liberi; Debra Bressan; Lihong Wan; Nancy M Hollingsworth; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  135 in total

1.  Long Noncoding RNAs CUPID1 and CUPID2 Mediate Breast Cancer Risk at 11q13 by Modulating the Response to DNA Damage.

Authors:  Joshua A Betts; Mahdi Moradi Marjaneh; Fares Al-Ejeh; Yi Chieh Lim; Wei Shi; Haran Sivakumaran; Romain Tropée; Ann-Marie Patch; Michael B Clark; Nenad Bartonicek; Adrian P Wiegmans; Kristine M Hillman; Susanne Kaufmann; Amanda L Bain; Brian S Gloss; Joanna Crawford; Stephen Kazakoff; Shivangi Wani; Shu W Wen; Bryan Day; Andreas Möller; Nicole Cloonan; John Pearson; Melissa A Brown; Timothy R Mercer; Nicola Waddell; Kum Kum Khanna; Eloise Dray; Marcel E Dinger; Stacey L Edwards; Juliet D French
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex Conducts the Orchestration of Damage Signaling and Outcomes to Stress in DNA Replication and Repair.

Authors:  Aleem Syed; John A Tainer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint defects in a mouse model of 'BRCAness' are partially rescued by 53BP1 deletion.

Authors:  Sarah M Misenko; Dharm S Patel; Joonyoung Her; Samuel F Bunting
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Is Associated with Oxidative Stress-induced Genome Instability.

Authors:  Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  TDP1 promotes assembly of non-homologous end joining protein complexes on DNA.

Authors:  Jinho Heo; Jing Li; Matthew Summerlin; Annette Hays; Sachin Katyal; Peter J McKinnon; Karin C Nitiss; John L Nitiss; Leslyn A Hanakahi
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-03-17

Review 6.  Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Eric Danner; Sanum Bashir; Saniye Yumlu; Wolfgang Wurst; Benedikt Wefers; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 7.  Histone modifications and the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Hieu T Van; Margarida A Santos
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Characterizing DNA Repair Processes at Transient and Long-lasting Double-strand DNA Breaks by Immunofluorescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Vaibhav Murthy; Dalton Dacus; Monica Gamez; Changkun Hu; Sebastian O Wendel; Jazmine Snow; Andrew Kahn; Stephen H Walterhouse; Nicholas A Wallace
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Hannah L Klein; Giedrė Bačinskaja; Jun Che; Anais Cheblal; Rajula Elango; Anastasiya Epshtein; Devon M Fitzgerald; Belén Gómez-González; Sharik R Khan; Sandeep Kumar; Bryan A Leland; Léa Marie; Qian Mei; Judith Miné-Hattab; Alicja Piotrowska; Erica J Polleys; Christopher D Putnam; Elina A Radchenko; Anissia Ait Saada; Cynthia J Sakofsky; Eun Yong Shim; Mathew Stracy; Jun Xia; Zhenxin Yan; Yi Yin; Andrés Aguilera; Juan Lucas Argueso; Catherine H Freudenreich; Susan M Gasser; Dmitry A Gordenin; James E Haber; Grzegorz Ira; Sue Jinks-Robertson; Megan C King; Richard D Kolodner; Andrei Kuzminov; Sarah Ae Lambert; Sang Eun Lee; Kyle M Miller; Sergei M Mirkin; Thomas D Petes; Susan M Rosenberg; Rodney Rothstein; Lorraine S Symington; Pawel Zawadzki; Nayun Kim; Michael Lisby; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2019-01-07

10.  A DNA nick at Ku-blocked double-strand break ends serves as an entry site for exonuclease 1 (Exo1) or Sgs1-Dna2 in long-range DNA end resection.

Authors:  Weibin Wang; James M Daley; Youngho Kwon; Xiaoyu Xue; Danielle S Krasner; Adam S Miller; Kevin A Nguyen; Elizabeth A Williamson; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee; Robert Hromas; Patrick Sung
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.