Literature DB >> 29939192

Characterizing DNA Repair Processes at Transient and Long-lasting Double-strand DNA Breaks by Immunofluorescence Microscopy.

Vaibhav Murthy1, Dalton Dacus1, Monica Gamez2, Changkun Hu1, Sebastian O Wendel1, Jazmine Snow1, Andrew Kahn1, Stephen H Walterhouse1, Nicholas A Wallace3.   

Abstract

The repair of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) in DNA is a highly coordinated process, necessitating the formation and resolution of multi-protein repair complexes. This process is regulated by a myriad of proteins that promote the association and disassociation of proteins to these lesions. Thanks in large part to the ability to perform functional screens of a vast library of proteins, there is a greater appreciation of the genes necessary for the double-strand DNA break repair. Often knockout or chemical inhibitor screens identify proteins involved in repair processes by using increased toxicity as a marker for a protein that is required for DSB repair. Although useful for identifying novel cellular proteins involved in maintaining genome fidelity, functional analysis requires the determination of whether the protein of interest promotes localization, formation, or resolution of repair complexes. The accumulation of repair proteins can be readily detected as distinct nuclear foci by immunofluorescence microscopy. Thus, association and disassociation of these proteins at sites of DNA damage can be accessed by observing these nuclear foci at representative intervals after the induction of double-strand DNA breaks. This approach can also identify mis-localized repair factor proteins, if repair defects do not simultaneously occur with incomplete delays in repair. In this scenario, long-lasting double-strand DNA breaks can be engineered by expressing a rare cutting endonuclease (e.g., I-SceI) in cells where the recognition site for the said enzyme has been integrated into the cellular genome. The resulting lesion is particularly hard to resolve as faithful repair will reintroduce the enzyme's recognition site, prompting another round of cleavage. As a result, differences in the kinetics of repair are eliminated. If repair complexes are not formed, localization has been impeded. This protocol describes the methodology necessary to identify changes in repair kinetics as well as repair protein localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29939192      PMCID: PMC6101641          DOI: 10.3791/57653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  29 in total

1.  I-BasI and I-HmuI: two phage intron-encoded endonucleases with homologous DNA recognition sequences but distinct DNA specificities.

Authors:  Markus Landthaler; Betty W Shen; Barry L Stoddard; David A Shub
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Homologous repair of DNA damage and tumorigenesis: the BRCA connection.

Authors:  Maria Jasin
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 4.  ATM and ATR signaling at a glance.

Authors:  Poorwa Awasthi; Marco Foiani; Amit Kumar
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Natural and engineered nicking endonucleases--from cleavage mechanism to engineering of strand-specificity.

Authors:  Siu-Hong Chan; Barry L Stoddard; Shuang-Yong Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Cell cycle-dependent induction of homologous recombination by a tightly regulated I-SceI fusion protein.

Authors:  Andrea Hartlerode; Shobu Odate; Inbo Shim; Jenifer Brown; Ralph Scully
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the maintenance of genomic stability.

Authors:  K Gudmundsdottir; A Ashworth
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Pathway choice in DNA double strand break repair: observations of a balancing act.

Authors:  Inger Brandsma; Dik C Gent
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2012-11-27

9.  Micronuclei in genotoxicity assessment: from genetics to epigenetics and beyond.

Authors:  Lidiya Luzhna; Palak Kathiria; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  A generic strategy for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene tagging.

Authors:  Daniel H Lackner; Alexia Carré; Paloma M Guzzardo; Carina Banning; Ramu Mangena; Tom Henley; Sarah Oberndorfer; Bianca V Gapp; Sebastian M B Nijman; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Tilmann Bürckstümmer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Beta Human Papillomavirus 8 E6 Induces Micronucleus Formation and Promotes Chromothripsis.

Authors:  Dalton Dacus; Steven Stancic; Sarah R Pollina; Elizabeth Rifrogiate; Rachel Palinski; Nicholas A Wallace
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.549

Review 2.  Beta HPV Deregulates Double-Strand Break Repair.

Authors:  Changkun Hu; Nicholas Wallace
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  Beta Human Papillomavirus 8E6 Attenuates LATS Phosphorylation after Failed Cytokinesis.

Authors:  Dalton Dacus; Celeste Cotton; Tristan X McCallister; Nicholas A Wallace
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Beta human papillomavirus 8 E6 allows colocalization of non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination repair factors.

Authors:  Changkun Hu; Taylor Bugbee; Dalton Dacus; Rachel Palinski; Nicholas Wallace
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.