Literature DB >> 24469014

Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines and effect on quality of indoor air.

Duygu Göksay Kadaifciler1, Aysin Cotuk.   

Abstract

The microbiological quality in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) is considered to be important because patients and dental staff with suppressed immune systems are regularly exposed to water and aerosols generated from dental units (DUs). Opportunistic pathogens like Pseudomonas, Legionella, Candida, and Aspergillus can be present in DUWLs, while during consultations, bioaerosols can be dispersed in the air, thus resulting in effects on microbiological quality of indoor air. This present study represents microbiological air and water quality in dental offices (DOs) and also concerns the relationship between the quality of DO air and dental unit water. This study aimed to assess both the microbial quality of dental unit water and the indoor air in 20 DOs and to survey the effect on the quality of the indoor air with the existing microorganisms in dental unit water. Fourteen out of 20 (70 %) DUWLs were found to be contaminated with a high number of aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacteria. In terms of bacterial air contamination levels, in 90 % of DOs, a medium level (<500 colony-forming units (CFU)/m(3)) of contamination was determined, while in terms of microfungal air contamination, in all DOs, a low level (<100 CFU/m(3)) of contamination was determined. Potential infection or allergen agents, such as Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Alternaria, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Paecilomyces were isolated from water and air samples. This study's determination of contamination sources and evaluation of microbial load in DOs could contribute to the development of quality control methods in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469014     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3628-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  50 in total

1.  Occurrence and hygienic relevance of fungi in drinking water.

Authors:  D Kanzler; W Buzina; A Paulitsch; D Haas; S Platzer; E Marth; F Mascher
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.377

2.  Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in Istanbul, Turkey.

Authors:  Duygu Göksay; Ayşin Cotuk; Zuhal Zeybek
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Measurement of airborne bacteria and endotoxin generated during dental cleaning.

Authors:  Steve Dutil; Anne Meriaux; Marie-Chantale de Latremoille; Louis Lazure; Jean Barbeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Quantitative analysis of bacterial aerosols in two different dental clinic environments.

Authors:  D Grenier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Fusariosis associated with pathogenic fusarium species colonization of a hospital water system: a new paradigm for the epidemiology of opportunistic mold infections.

Authors:  E J Anaissie; R T Kuchar; J H Rex; A Francesconi; M Kasai; F M Müller; M Lozano-Chiu; R C Summerbell; M C Dignani; S J Chanock; T J Walsh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-10-24       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  The role of manufacturers in reducing biofilms in dental chair waterlines.

Authors:  D C Coleman; M J O'Donnell; A C Shore; J Swan; R J Russell
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigation of the bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility of dental units.

Authors:  Nihal Dogruöz Güngör; Duygu Göksay Kadaifçiler; Oya Öztan Peker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Europe.

Authors:  J T Walker; D J Bradshaw; M Finney; M R Fulford; E Frandsen; E ØStergaard; J M Ten Cate; W R Moorer; A J Schel; A Mavridou; J J Kamma; G Mandilara; L Stösser; S Kneist; R Araujo; N Contreras; P Goroncy-Bermes; D O'Mullane; F Burke; A Forde; M O'Sullivan; P D Marsh
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.612

9.  Identification of Exophiala mesophila isolated from treated dental unit waterlines.

Authors:  N B Porteous; A M Grooters; S W Redding; E H Thompson; M G Rinaldi; G S De Hoog; D A Sutton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Effects of hydrogen peroxide on dental unit biofilms and treatment water contamination.

Authors:  Shih-Ming Lin; Kathy K H Svoboda; Anthony Giletto; Jeff Seibert; Raghunath Puttaiah
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-01
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review on bio-aerosols in healthcare and the dental environment.

Authors:  Charifa Zemouri; Hans de Soet; Wim Crielaard; Alexa Laheij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Analysis of fungi in aerosols dispersed by high speed pens in dental clinics from Teresina, Piaui, Brazil.

Authors:  Aline Maria Alves Vilarinho Oliveira; Rômulo Maia de Alencar; Jhonatas Cley Santos Porto; Isla Rita Brito Fontenele Ramos; Iraci Salmito Noleto; Tanit Clementino Santos; Mitra Mobin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Are aerosol control devices effective in preventing the spread of dental aerosol?

Authors:  Elif Seher Böke; Ali Keleş; Cangül Keskin; Yeliz Tanrıverdi Çaycı; Tugba Turk
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Application of D-Amino Acids as Biofilm Dispersing Agent in Dental Unit Waterlines.

Authors:  Ruchanee Salingcarnboriboon Ampornaramveth; Nilada Akeatichod; Jesita Lertnukkhid; Nichakorn Songsang
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-01-14

5.  Dental Unit Waterlines: A Survey of Practices in Eastern France.

Authors:  Alexandre Baudet; Julie Lizon; Jean-Marc Martrette; Frédéric Camelot; Arnaud Florentin; Céline Clément
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Evaluation of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cetylpyridinium Chloride as Bacterial Decontaminants of Dental Unit Water Lines at a Private Peruvian Dental School.

Authors:  Arnaldo Munive-Degregori; Frank Mayta-Tovalino; Walter Gallo; Silvia Luza; Franco Mauricio; Saul Ilizarbe; Arnaldo Munive-Méndez
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-11-24

7.  Effectiveness of a Water Disinfection Method Based on Osmosis and Chlorine Dioxide for the Prevention of Microbial Contamination in Dental Practices.

Authors:  Michele Totaro; Federica Badalucco; Francesca Papini; Niccolò Grassi; Marina Mannocci; Matteo Baggiani; Benedetta Tuvo; Beatrice Casini; Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris; Angelo Baggiani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Broad Diversity of Fungi in Hospital Water.

Authors:  Máira Gazzola Arroyo; Adriano Menis Ferreira; Oleci Pereira Frota; Natalia Seron Brizzotti-Mazuchi; Jacqueline Tanury Macruz Peresi; Marcelo Alessandro Rigotti; Carlos Eduardo Macedo; Alvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa; Denise de Andrade; Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-07-04

9.  Efficacy of BRS® and Alpron®/Bilpron® Disinfectants for Dental Unit Waterlines: A Six-Year Study.

Authors:  Alexandre Baudet; Julie Lizon; Jean-Marc Martrette; Frédéric Camelot; Arnaud Florentin; Céline Clément
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Dental aerosols: microbial composition and spatial distribution.

Authors:  C Zemouri; C M C Volgenant; M J Buijs; W Crielaard; N A M Rosema; B W Brandt; A M G A Laheij; J J De Soet
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.474

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.