Literature DB >> 15458499

Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Europe.

J T Walker1, D J Bradshaw, M Finney, M R Fulford, E Frandsen, E ØStergaard, J M Ten Cate, W R Moorer, A J Schel, A Mavridou, J J Kamma, G Mandilara, L Stösser, S Kneist, R Araujo, N Contreras, P Goroncy-Bermes, D O'Mullane, F Burke, A Forde, M O'Sullivan, P D Marsh.   

Abstract

A range of opportunistic pathogens have been associated with dental unit water systems (DUWS), particularly in the biofilms that can line the tubing. This study therefore aimed to assess the microbiology of DUWS and biofilms in general dental practices across seven European countries, including the United Kingdom (UK), Ireland (IRL), Greece (GR), Spain (ES), Germany (D), Denmark (DK) and the Netherlands (NL). Water supplied by 51% of 237 dental unit water lines exceeded current American Dental Association recommendations of < or = 200 colony-forming units (CFU) ml(-1). Microbiological loading of the source waters was between 0 (Denmark, the Netherlands and Spain) and 4.67 (IRL) log CFU ml(-1); water line samples from the DUWS ranged from 1.52 (ES) to 2.79 (GR) log CFU ml(-1); and biofilm counts ranged from 1.49 (GR) to 3.22 (DK) log CFU.cm(-2). Opportunistic pathogens such as legionellae (DK and ES), including Legionella pneumophila SG1 (DK and GR), and Mycobacterium spp. (DK, NL, GR, D and ES) were recovered occasionally. Presumptive oral streptococci (ES and NL), oral anaerobes (GR), Candida spp. (UK, NL and ES) and blood (GR and IRL) were detected at relatively low frequencies, but their presence indicated a failure of the 3-in-1 antiretraction valve, leading to back siphonage of oral fluids into the water and biofilm phase. These findings confirm that a substantial proportion of DUWS have high levels of microbial contamination, irrespective of country, type of equipment and source water. The study emphasizes the need for effective mechanisms to reduce the microbial burden within DUWS, and highlights the risk of occupational exposure and cross-infection in general dental practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15458499     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00151.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  22 in total

1.  Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in Istanbul, Turkey.

Authors:  Duygu Göksay; Ayşin Cotuk; Zuhal Zeybek
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comparison of the microbial load of incoming and distal outlet waters from dental unit water systems in Istanbul.

Authors:  Irfan Türetgen; Duygu Göksay; Aysin Cotuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Appraisal of microbial contamination of dental unit water systems and practices of general dental practitioners for risk reduction.

Authors:  Bajrang Lal; Khaiwal Ravindra; Manisha Biswal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines and effect on quality of indoor air.

Authors:  Duygu Göksay Kadaifciler; Aysin Cotuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines.

Authors:  Jolanta Szymańska; Jolanta Sitkowska
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Evaluation of antimicrobial-antibiofilm activity of a hydrogen peroxide decontaminating system used in dental unit water lines.

Authors:  Germano Orrù; Susanna Del Nero; Enrica Tuveri; Maria Laura Ciusa; Francesca Pilia; Matteo Erriu; Ginevra Orrù; Manuele Liciardi; Vincenzo Piras; Gloria Denotti
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2010-07-20

7.  Integration and proliferation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 in multispecies biofilms.

Authors:  Mahtab Ghadakpour; Elanna Bester; Steven N Liss; Michael Gardam; Ian Droppo; S Hota; Gideon M Wolfaardt
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union.

Authors:  A J Schel; P D Marsh; D J Bradshaw; M Finney; M R Fulford; E Frandsen; E Østergaard; J M ten Cate; W R Moorer; A Mavridou; J J Kamma; G Mandilara; L Stösser; S Kneist; R Araujo; N Contreras; P Goroncy-Bermes; D O'Mullane; F Burke; P O'Reilly; G Hourigan; M O'Sullivan; R Holman; J T Walker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Distinct Microbial Community of Accumulated Biofilm in Dental Unit Waterlines of Different Specialties.

Authors:  Cancan Fan; Haijing Gu; Limin Liu; Haiwei Zhu; Juan Yan; Yongbiao Huo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from dental office environments and units in Barretos, state of São Paulo, Brazil, and analysis of their susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs.

Authors:  Ana Claudia de Oliveira; Renato Pariz Maluta; Ariel Eurides Stella; Everlon Cid Rigobelo; José Moacir Marin; Fernando Antonio de Ávila
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.