Literature DB >> 24463841

Validity of a Web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale.

Audrey H Calderwood1, Judith R Logan, Michael Zurfluh, David A Lieberman, Brian C Jacobson, Timothy C Heeren, Paul C Schroy.   

Abstract

GOALS: Our goal was to assess the validity of a Web-based educational program on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
BACKGROUND: Data on Web-based education for improving the practice and quality of colonoscopy are limited. STUDY: Endoscopists worldwide participated in the BBPS Educational Program. We assessed program completion rates, satisfaction, short-term (0 to 90 d) and long-term (91 to 180 d) uptake of the BBPS, and the validity of the program by measuring the reliability of the BBPS among participants.
RESULTS: A total of 207 endoscopists completed the program. Overall, 93% found the content relevant, 89% felt confident in using the BBPS, and 97% thought the quality was good or excellent. Uptake of the BBPS into clinical practice was robust with 91% and 98% of colonoscopy reports containing the BBPS at short-term and long-term follow-up, respectively. The interobserver and test-retest reliability of BBPS segment and total scores were both substantial.
CONCLUSIONS: A BBPS Web-based educational program facilitates adoption into clinical practice and teaches the BBPS to be used reliably by a diverse group of endoscopists worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463841      PMCID: PMC4108578          DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  23 in total

1.  Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure.

Authors:  Mercedes Ibáñez; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Paz Zaballa; Alejandro Jiménez; Rosario Fernández-Velázquez; Jacobo Ortiz Fernández-Sordo; Oscar González-Bernardo; Luis Rodrigo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Knowledge of quality performance measures associated with endoscopy among gastroenterology trainees and the impact of a web-based intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer S Thompson; Benjamin Lebwohl; Sapna Syngal; Fay Kastrinos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Edwin J Lai; Oren K Fix; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Colonoscopy preparation: polyethylene glycol with Gatorade is as safe and efficacious as four liters of polyethylene glycol with balanced electrolytes.

Authors:  Thomas McKenna; Alice Macgill; Gail Porat; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  B K Enestvedt; M B Fennerty; G M Eisen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 6.  Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Catharine M Walsh; Mary E Sherlock; Simon C Ling; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

7.  Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jae Woong Tae; Jong Chan Lee; Su Jin Hong; Jae Pil Han; Yun Hee Lee; Jong Ho Chung; Hyung Geun Yoon; Bong Min Ko; Joo Young Cho; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Randomised clinical trial: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a comparison between two different PEG-based formulations.

Authors:  A Repici; R Cestari; V Annese; G Biscaglia; E Vitetta; L Minelli; G Trallori; S Orselli; A Andriulli; C Hassan
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jason B Samarasena; V Raman Muthusamy; M Mazen Jamal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Effect of a primary care continuing education program on clinical practice of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: translating theory into practice.

Authors:  Sandra G Adams; Jennifer Pitts; JoEllen Wynne; Barbara P Yawn; Edward J Diamond; Shuko Lee; Ed Dellert; Nicola A Hanania
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multiple, zonal and multi-zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stefano Pontone; Cesare Hassan; Roberta Maselli; Paolo Pontone; Rita Angelini; Manuela Brighi; Gregorio Patrizi; Daniele Pironi; Fabio Massimo Magliocca; Angelo Filippini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Quality of Colonoscopy Performed in Rural Practice: Experience From the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative and the Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Jennifer L Holub; Cynthia Morris; Lyle J Fagnan; Judith R Logan; LeAnn C Michaels; David A Lieberman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.

Authors:  Matthew A Kluge; J Lucas Williams; Connie K Wu; Brian C Jacobson; Paul C Schroy; David A Lieberman; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Video on Diet Before Outpatient Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sean C Rice; Tina Higginbotham; Melanie J Dean; James C Slaughter; Patrick S Yachimski; Keith L Obstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Paul C Schroy; David A Lieberman; Judith R Logan; Michael Zurfluh; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Clinical practice standards for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Aya Hammami; Hanen Elloumi; Riadh Bouali; Hela Elloumi
Journal:  Tunis Med       Date:  2021 Octobre

Review 8.  A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting.

Authors:  Robyn S Sharma; Peter G Rossos
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.