Literature DB >> 22565162

Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study.

Jason B Samarasena1, V Raman Muthusamy, M Mazen Jamal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: MiraLAX with Gatorade is a low-volume bowel preparation regimen that has been used widely in community practice and is anecdotally better tolerated than Golytely. Despite its widespread use, there are little data on the efficacy and tolerability of this solution and no safety data in the literature. The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of single-dosed and split-dosed regimens of MiraLAX/Gatorade with Golytely for bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
METHODS: Adults presenting for outpatient colonoscopy were screened for enrollment into this single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with severe cardiac or renal disease and patients with electrolyte abnormalities were excluded. Subjects were randomized into four groups: 4 l Golytely single-dosed (Go-Si), 4 l Golytely split-dosed (Go-Sp), 238 g MiraLAX in 64 oz of Gatorade single-dosed (Mlax-Si), and MiraLAX/Gatorade split-dosed (Mlax-Sp) groups. Laboratory data including complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and osmolality were collected before the day of bowel preparation and just before the start of colonoscopy. Subjects completed a survey assessing taste and tolerability of the solution. Colonoscopies were recorded using video recording software and de-identified. Colonoscopy videos were evaluated for efficacy of cleansing by two blinded endoscopists. Two validated bowel preparation scales were used to assess bowel cleansing: the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS; 0-9 best) and Ottawa Scale (0-14 worst).
RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were evaluated in this study (86.2% male, mean age 59.4). Of these, 57 subjects were randomized to the Go-Si group, 51 to Go-Sp group, 60 to Mlax-Si group, and 54 to Mlax-Sp group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, or timing of colonoscopy between the groups (P>0.05). Mean BBPS scores were: Go-Si=6.07, Go-Sp=8.33, Mlax-Si=6.62, and Mlax-Sp=8.01. Mean Ottawa score for the groups were: Go-Si group=6.77, Go-Sp=4.12, Mlax-Si=6.25, and Mlax-Sp=4.8. Go-Sp resulted in significantly better cleansing than Go-Si (P<0.01). Mlax-Sp resulted in significantly better cleansing than Mlax-Si (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in BBPS between Go-Sp and Mlax-Sp. There were no clinically significant electrolyte changes from baseline in any subject in any group after bowel prep (P>0.05). Subjects rated the taste and overall experience of Mlax/Gatorade preparation better than Golytely (P<0.01). In all, 96.8% of Mlax/Gatorade subjects were willing to repeat the same preparation vs. 75% for Golytely subjects (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade was an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the low-risk patients in this study. MiraLAX/Gatorade appears to be more tolerable than Golytely as a bowel cleansing regimen and was the preferred agent by the patients in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22565162     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

Review 1.  Adjuncts to colonic cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sanghoon Park; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Colon cleansing for colonoscopy 2013: current status.

Authors:  Stephen W Landreneau; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-08

3.  Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Phillip Gu; Daniel Lew; Sun Jung Oh; Aarshi Vipani; Jeffrey Ko; Kevin Hsu; Ebrahim Mirakhor; Varun Pattisapu; Tia Bullen; Garth Fuller; Brennan M R Spiegel; Christopher V Almario
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance.

Authors:  Nicole M Harrison; Michael C Hjelkrem
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-10

Review 5.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats.

Authors:  Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-16

6.  Validity of a Web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Judith R Logan; Michael Zurfluh; David A Lieberman; Brian C Jacobson; Timothy C Heeren; Paul C Schroy
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Safety of MiraLAX/Gatorade bowel preparation has not been established in appropriately designed studies.

Authors:  Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Effectiveness of a simplified "patient friendly" split dose polyethylene glycol colonoscopy prep in Veterans Health Administration patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Cohen; Raymond S Tang; Erik Groessl; Ann Herrin; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-01

9.  Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities.

Authors:  David Widjaja; Manoj Bhandari; Vivian Loveday-Laghi; Mariela Glandt; Bhavna Balar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

10.  Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Paul C Schroy; David A Lieberman; Judith R Logan; Michael Zurfluh; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.