Literature DB >> 24629422

Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.

Audrey H Calderwood1, Paul C Schroy1, David A Lieberman2, Judith R Logan3, Michael Zurfluh2, Brian C Jacobson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Establishing a threshold of bowel cleanliness below which colonoscopies should be repeated at accelerated intervals is important, yet there are no standardized definitions for an adequate preparation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores could serve as a standard definition of adequacy.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational analysis of colonoscopy data from 36 adult GI endoscopy practices and prospective survey showing 4 standardized colonoscopy videos with varying degrees of bowel cleanliness.
SETTING: The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative. PATIENTS: Average-risk patients attending screening colonoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Recommended follow-up intervals among average-risk, screening colonoscopies without polyps stratified by BBPS scores.
RESULTS: We evaluated 2516 negative screening colonoscopies performed by 74 endoscopists. If the BBPS score was ≥2 in all 3 segments (N = 2295), follow-up was recommended in 10 years in 90% of cases. Examinations with total BBPS scores of 3 to 5 (N = 167) had variable recommendations. Follow-up within 1 year was recommended for 96% of examinations with total BBPS scores of 0 to 2 (N = 26). Similar results were noted among 167 participants in a video survey with pre-established BBPS scores. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.
CONCLUSION: BBPS scores correlate with endoscopist behavior regarding follow-up intervals for colonoscopy. A total BBPS score ≥6 and/or all segment scores ≥2 provides a standardized definition of adequate for 10-year follow-up, whereas total scores ≤2 indicate that a procedure should be repeated within 1 year. Future work should focus on finding consensus for management of examinations with total scores of 3 to 5.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629422      PMCID: PMC4104141          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  21 in total

1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Marion Nadel; Robert A Smith; Wendy Atkin; Subash B Duggirala; Robert Fletcher; Seth N Glick; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; John B Pope; Michael B Potter; David Ransohoff; Douglas Rex; Robert Schoen; Paul Schroy; Sidney Winawer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shomron Ben-Horin; Simon Bar-Meir; Benjamin Avidan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer Holub; Glenn Eisen; Dale Kraemer; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Virender K Sharma; Pat de Garmo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patients.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Matthew D Moravec; Glenn M Eisen; Dawn Peters; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Validity of a Web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Judith R Logan; Michael Zurfluh; David A Lieberman; Brian C Jacobson; Timothy C Heeren; Paul C Schroy
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme--a realistic approach with additional benefits.

Authors:  N J West; A P Poullis; R J Leicester
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research.

Authors:  Edwin J Lai; Audrey H Calderwood; Gheorghe Doros; Oren K Fix; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas O Faigel; Judith R Logan; Nora Mattek; Jennifer Holub; Glenn Eisen; Cynthia Morris; Robert Smith; Marion Nadel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Robin Parmar; Myriam Martel; Alaa Rostom; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Prucalopride in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Park; Seok-Pyo Shin; Ji Taek Hong
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.

Authors:  Brian T Clark; Petr Protiva; Anil Nagar; Avlin Imaeda; Maria M Ciarleglio; Yanhong Deng; Loren Laine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kjetil Garborg; Thomas de Lange; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09

6.  The advantage of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution combined with lactulose in patients with long interval preparation-to-colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hu Yuanchao; Li Xueping; Lin Tao; Niu Jianping; Mi Man
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Goretti Hernandez; Ana Aldea; David Nicolás-Pérez; Alejandro Jiménez; Marta Carrillo; Vanesa Felipe; Onofre Alarcón-Fernández; Manuel Hernandez-Guerra; Rafael Romero; Inmaculada Alonso; Yanira Gonzalez; Zaida Adrian; Miguel Moreno; Laura Ramos; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Young S Oh; Thomas Hollander; Chien-Huan Chen; Gregory S Sayuk; Nicholas Davidson; Daniel Mullady; Faris M Murad; Noura M Sharabash; Eric Ruettgers; Themistocles Dassopoulos; Jeffrey J Easler; C Prakash Gyawali; Steven A Edmundowicz; Dayna S Early
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Katherine D Thompson; Paul C Schroy; David A Lieberman; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Video on Diet Before Outpatient Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sean C Rice; Tina Higginbotham; Melanie J Dean; James C Slaughter; Patrick S Yachimski; Keith L Obstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.