OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for diagnosis and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in an animal model by T1 relaxation time measurement. METHODS: Thirty-four rabbits were divided into the control group (n = 10) and NAFLD group, which was split into four groups (n = 6) with a high-fat diet for an interval of 3 weeks. A dual flip angle was performed before and at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). T1 relaxation times of the liver parenchyma and the decrease rate (∆%) were calculated. Histological findings according to semi-quantitative scoring of steatosis, activity and fibrosis were the standard of reference. RESULTS: HBP and ∆% T1 relaxation time measurement showed significant differences between normal and NAFLD groups, between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NAFLD without NASH (p = 0.000-0.049), between fibrosis groups (p = 0.000-0.019), but no difference between F1 and F2 (p = 0.834). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of T1 relaxation time for HBP and ∆% were 0.86-0.93 for the selection of NASH and activity score ≥2, and 0.86-0.95 for the selection of F ≥ 1, 2, 3. No significant difference was found for diagnostic performance between HBP and ∆% T1 relaxation time. CONCLUSIONS: HBP T1 relaxation time measurement of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was useful to evaluate NAFLD according to the SAF score. HBP T1 relaxation time measurement was as accurate as ∆% T1 relaxation time. KEY POINTS: • Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI could give useful information on NAFLD. •HBP T 1 relaxation time measurement was useful for the evaluation of NAFLD. • HBP T 1 relaxation time measurement was as accurate as ∆%.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for diagnosis and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in an animal model by T1 relaxation time measurement. METHODS: Thirty-four rabbits were divided into the control group (n = 10) and NAFLD group, which was split into four groups (n = 6) with a high-fat diet for an interval of 3 weeks. A dual flip angle was performed before and at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). T1 relaxation times of the liver parenchyma and the decrease rate (∆%) were calculated. Histological findings according to semi-quantitative scoring of steatosis, activity and fibrosis were the standard of reference. RESULTS: HBP and ∆% T1 relaxation time measurement showed significant differences between normal and NAFLD groups, between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NAFLD without NASH (p = 0.000-0.049), between fibrosis groups (p = 0.000-0.019), but no difference between F1 and F2 (p = 0.834). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of T1 relaxation time for HBP and ∆% were 0.86-0.93 for the selection of NASH and activity score ≥2, and 0.86-0.95 for the selection of F ≥ 1, 2, 3. No significant difference was found for diagnostic performance between HBP and ∆% T1 relaxation time. CONCLUSIONS: HBP T1 relaxation time measurement of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was useful to evaluate NAFLD according to the SAF score. HBP T1 relaxation time measurement was as accurate as ∆% T1 relaxation time. KEY POINTS: • Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI could give useful information on NAFLD. •HBP T 1 relaxation time measurement was useful for the evaluation of NAFLD. • HBP T 1 relaxation time measurement was as accurate as ∆%.
Authors: Elizabeth K Speliotes; Johannah L Butler; Cameron D Palmer; Benjamin F Voight; Joel N Hirschhorn Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: O Dahlqvist Leinhard; N Dahlström; J Kihlberg; P Sandström; T B Brismar; O Smedby; P Lundberg Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-10-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Craig D Fisher; Andrew J Lickteig; Lisa M Augustine; Ronald P J Oude Elferink; David G Besselsen; Robert P Erickson; Nathan J Cherrington Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: L Pascolo; F Cupelli; P L Anelli; V Lorusso; M Visigalli; F Uggeri; C Tiribelli Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1999-04-21 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Constanze Bardach; Leonie Morski; Katharina Mascherbauer; Carolina Donà; Matthias Koschutnik; Kseniya Halavina; Christian Nitsche; Dietrich Beitzke; Christian Loewe; Elisabeth Waldmann; Michael Trauner; Julia Mascherbauer; Christian Hengstenberg; Andreas Kammerlander Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Jérémy Dana; Aïna Venkatasamy; Antonio Saviano; Joachim Lupberger; Yujin Hoshida; Valérie Vilgrain; Pierre Nahon; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix; Thomas F Baumert Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 9.029