Literature DB >> 24955641

Translating biotechnology to knowledge-based innovation, peace, and development? Deploy a Science Peace Corps--an open letter to world leaders.

Nezih Hekim1, Yavuz Coşkun, Ahmet Sınav, Alaa H Abou-Zeid, Mehmet Ağırbaşlı, Simisola O Akintola, Şükrü Aynacıoğlu, Mustafa Bayram, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Collet Dandara, Türkay Dereli, Edward S Dove, Levent Elbeyli, Laszlo Endrenyi, Kamile Erciyas, Jack Faris, Lynnette R Ferguson, Fahrettin Göğüş, Kıvanç Güngör, Mervi Gürsoy, Ulvi K Gürsoy, M Asım Karaömerlioğlu, Ilona Kickbusch, Türker Kılıç, Metin Kılınç, Tanıl Kocagöz, Biaoyang Lin, Adrián LLerena, Vangelis G Manolopoulos, Bipin Nair, Bülent Özkan, Tikki Pang, Şemra Sardaş, Sanjeeva Srivastava, Cengiz Toraman, Kemal Üstün, Louise Warnich, Ambroise Wonkam, Mustafa Cengiz Yakıcıer, Ümit Yaşar, Vural Özdemir.   

Abstract

Scholarship knows no geographical boundaries. This science diplomacy and biotechnology journalism article introduces an original concept and policy petition to innovate the global translational science, a Science Peace Corps. Service at the new Corps could entail volunteer work for a minimum of 6 weeks, and up to a maximum of 2 years, for translational research in any region of the world to build capacity manifestly for development and peace, instead of the narrow bench-to-bedside model of life science translation. Topics for translational research are envisioned to include all fields of life sciences and medicine, as long as they are linked to potential or concrete endpoints in development, foreign policy, conflict management, post-crisis capacity building, and/or peace scholarship domains. As a new instrument in the global science and technology governance toolbox, a Science Peace Corps could work effectively, for example, towards elucidating the emerging concept of "one health"--encompassing human, environmental, plant, microbial, ecosystem, and planet health--thus serving as an innovative crosscutting pillar of 21(st) century integrative biology. An interdisciplinary program of this caliber for development would link 21(st) century life sciences to foreign policy and peace, in ways that can benefit many nations despite their ideological differences. We note that a Science Peace Corps is timely. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the United Nations released the Fifth Assessment Report on March 31, 2014. Worrisomely, the report underscores that no person or nation will remain untouched by the climate change, highlighting the shared pressing life sciences challenges for global society. To this end, we recall that President John F. Kennedy advocated for volunteer work that has enduring, transgenerational, and global impacts. This culminated in establishment of the Peace Corps in 1961. Earlier, President Abraham Lincoln aptly observed, "nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." We therefore petition President Barack Obama, other world leaders, and international development agencies in positions of power around the globe, to consider deploying a Science Peace Corps to cultivate the essential (and presently missing) ties among life sciences, foreign policy, development, and peace agendas. A Science Peace Corps requires support by a credible and independent intergovernmental organization or development agency for funding, and arbitration in the course of volunteer work when the global versus local (glocal) value-based priorities and human rights intersect in synergy or conflict. In all, Science Peace Corps is an invitation to a new pathway for competence in 21(st) century science that is locally productive and globally competitive. It can open up scientific institutions to broader considerations and broader inputs, and thus cultivate vital translational science in a world sorely in need of solidarity and sustainable responses to the challenges of 21(st) century science and society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24955641      PMCID: PMC4086476          DOI: 10.1089/omi.2014.0079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  16 in total

1.  How can we help? From "sociology in" to "sociology of" bioethics.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Ancestry and disease in the age of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Charles N Rotimi; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Tackling the political determinants of global health.

Authors:  Ilona Kickbusch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

4.  First FDA authorization for next-generation sequencer.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Margaret A Hamburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  'Regular science' is inherently political.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Vural Ozdemir
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  OMICS 2.0: a practice turn for 21(st) century science and society.

Authors:  Vural Özdemir
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2013-01

Review 7.  Ready to put metadata on the post-2015 development agenda? Linking data publications to responsible innovation and science diplomacy.

Authors:  Vural Özdemir; Eugene Kolker; Peter J Hotez; Sophie Mohin; Barbara Prainsack; Brian Wynne; Effy Vayena; Yavuz Coşkun; Türkay Dereli; Farah Huzair; Alexander Borda-Rodriguez; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Jack Faris; Raj Ramesar; Ambroise Wonkam; Collet Dandara; Bipin Nair; Adrián Llerena; Koray Kılıç; Rekha Jain; Panga Jaipal Reddy; Kishore Gollapalli; Sanjeeva Srivastava; Ilona Kickbusch
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-01

8.  The epiknowledge of socially responsible innovation.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Vural Ozdemir
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  All the post-genomic world is a stage: the actors and narrators required for translating pharmacogenomics into public health.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Vural Ozdemir
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Glocal bioethics: When international IRB collaboration confronts local politics.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Vural Ozdemir
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of Nine Consensus Indices in Delphi Foresight Research and Their Dependency on Delphi Survey Characteristics: A Simulation Study and Debate on Delphi Design and Interpretation.

Authors:  Stanislav Birko; Edward S Dove; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Akram Alyass; Michelle Turcotte; David Meyre
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  A Delphi Technology Foresight Study: Mapping Social Construction of Scientific Evidence on Metagenomics Tests for Water Safety.

Authors:  Stanislav Birko; Edward S Dove; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.