Literature DB >> 30834173

ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet.

Kathleen Vancleef1, Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza2, Craig Sharp3, Gareth Slack3, Carla Black1, Therese Casanova1, Jess Hugill1, Sheima Rafiq1, James Burridge1, Vito Puyat1, Josee Ewane Enongue1, Henry Gale1, Hannah Akotei1, Zoe Collier1, Helen Haggerty4, Kathryn Smart4, Christine Powell4, Kate Taylor4, Michael P Clarke1,4, Graham Morgan3, Jenny C A Read1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a new stereotest in the form of a game on an autostereoscopic tablet computer designed to be suitable for use in the eye clinic and present data on its reliability and the distribution of stereo thresholds in adults.
METHODS: Test stimuli were four dynamic random-dot stereograms, one of which contained a disparate target. Feedback was given after each trial presentation. A Bayesian adaptive staircase adjusted target disparity. Threshold was estimated from the mean of the posterior distribution after 20 responses. Viewing distance was monitored via a forehead sticker viewed by the tablet's front camera, and screen parallax was adjusted dynamically so as to achieve the desired retinal disparity.
RESULTS: The tablet must be viewed at a distance of greater than ∼35 cm to produce a good depth percept. Log thresholds were roughly normally distributed with a mean of 1.75 log10 arcsec = 56 arcsec and SD of 0.34 log10 arcsec = a factor of 2.2. The standard deviation agrees with previous studies, but ASTEROID thresholds are approximately 1.5 times higher than a similar stereotest on stereoscopic 3D TV or on Randot Preschool stereotests. Pearson correlation between successive tests in same observer was 0.80. Bland-Altman 95% limits of reliability were ±0.64 log10 arcsec = a factor of 4.3, corresponding to an SD of 0.32 log10 arcsec on individual threshold estimates. This is similar to other stereotests and close to the statistical limit for 20 responses.
CONCLUSIONS: ASTEROID is reliable, easy, and portable and thus well-suited for clinical stereoacuity measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: New 3D digital technology means that research-quality psychophysical measurement of stereoacuity is now feasible in the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocular vision; depth perception; psychophysics; stereoacuity; stereopsis

Year:  2019        PMID: 30834173      PMCID: PMC6396686          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.8.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


  38 in total

1.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test: automatic measurement of stereo threshold.

Authors:  M Bach; C Schmitt; M Kromeier; G Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender.

Authors:  Charles M Zaroff; Magosha Knutelska; Thomas E Frumkes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Neural theories of simple visual discriminations.

Authors:  H R BLACKWELL
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-01

5.  Is there a sensory threshold?

Authors:  J A SWETS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest.

Authors:  L Garnham; J J Sloper
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  A new 3D monitor-based random-dot stereotest for children.

Authors:  Armin Breyer; Xiaoyi Jiang; Adrian Rütsche; Daniel S Mojon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Distance stereotest using a 3-dimensional monitor for adult subjects.

Authors:  Jongshin Kim; Hee Kyung Yang; Youngmin Kim; Byoungho Lee; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Factors associated with binocular single vision in microtropia/monofixation syndrome.

Authors:  E Hahn; W Cadera; R B Orton
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.882

10.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  8 in total

1.  Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Sheima Rafiq; Jess Hugill; Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Adam O'Neill; Vicente Puyat; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Contrast Sensitivity and Stereoacuity in Successfully Treated Refractive Amblyopia.

Authors:  Yu Jia; Qingqing Ye; Shenglan Zhang; Lei Feng; Jing Liu; Zixuan Xu; Yijing Zhuang; Yunsi He; Yusong Zhou; Xiaolan Chen; Ying Yao; Rengang Jiang; Benjamin Thompson; Jinrong Li
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Exogenous attention generalizes location transfer of perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Mariel Roberts; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Portela-Camino; Santiago Martín-González; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-05

5.  The impact of active research involvement of young children in the design of a new stereotest.

Authors:  Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Sheima Rafiq; Jessica Hugill-Jones; Jenny C A Read; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-06-06

6.  Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.

Authors:  Alice Grasso McCaslin; Kathleen Vancleef; Luke Hubert; Jenny C A Read; Nicholas Port
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; Kathleen Vancleef; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of stereoacuity with a digital mobile application.

Authors:  Silvia Bonfanti; Angelo Gargantini; Gabriele Esposito; Alessio Facchin; Marta Maffioletti; Silvio Maffioletti
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.117

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.