Literature DB >> 31462533

Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.

Jason M Samonds1, Veronica Choi2, Nicholas J Priebe2.   

Abstract

Stereopsis is a ubiquitous feature of primate mammalian vision, but little is known about if and how rodents such as mice use stereoscopic vision. We used random dot stereograms to test for stereopsis in male and female mice, and they were able to discriminate near from far surfaces over a range of disparities, with diminishing performance for small and large binocular disparities. Based on two-photon measurements of disparity tuning, the range of disparities represented in the visual cortex aligns with the behavior and covers a broad range of disparities. When we examined their binocular eye movements, we found that, unlike primates, mice did not systematically vary relative eye positions or use vergence eye movements when presented with different disparities. Nonetheless, the representation of disparity tuning was wide enough to capture stereoscopic information over a range of potential vergence angles. Although mice share fundamental characteristics of stereoscopic vision with primates and carnivores, their lack of disparity-dependent vergence eye movements and wide neuronal representation suggests that they may use a distinct strategy for stereopsis.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Binocular vision allows us to derive depth information by comparing right and left eye information. We characterized binocular integration in mice because tools exist in these animals to dissect the underlying neural circuitry for binocular vision. Using random dot stereograms, we find that behavior and disparity tuning in the visual cortex share fundamental characteristics with primates, but we did not observe any evidence of disparity-dependent changes in vergence angle. We propose that mice use a distinct strategy of stereopsis compared with primates by using a broad range of disparities to encode depth over a large field of view and to compensate for nonstereoscopic changes in vergence angle that arise during natural behavior.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocular; disparity; mouse; stereopsis; vergence; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31462533      PMCID: PMC6786824          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0895-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  64 in total

1.  The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments.

Authors:  S J Prince; A D Pointon; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Vergence eye movements are not essential for stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Arthur J Lugtigheid; Laurie M Wilcox; Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Johannes Burge; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Mouse primary visual cortex is used to detect both orientation and contrast changes.

Authors:  Lindsey L Glickfeld; Mark H Histed; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Origins of crossed and uncrossed retinal projections in pigmented and albino mice.

Authors:  U C Dräger; J F Olsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Imaging large-scale neural activity with cellular resolution in awake, mobile mice.

Authors:  Daniel A Dombeck; Anton N Khabbaz; Forrest Collman; Thomas L Adelman; David W Tank
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The development of vergence does not account for the onset of stereopsis.

Authors:  E E Birch; J Gwiazda; R Held
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Smaller is better: drift in gaze measurements due to pupil dynamics.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Weina Zhu; Yingzhou Hu; Xintian Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motion Discrimination and the Motion Aftereffect in Mouse Vision.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Sarina Lieberman; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  Why do animal eyes have pupils of different shapes?

Authors:  Martin S Banks; William W Sprague; Jürgen Schmoll; Jared A Q Parnell; Gordon D Love
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  11 in total

1.  Long-term Monocular Deprivation during Juvenile Critical Period Disrupts Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Thalamus.

Authors:  Carey Y L Huh; Karim Abdelaal; Kirstie J Salinas; Diyue Gu; Jack Zeitoun; Dario X Figueroa Velez; John P Peach; Charless C Fowlkes; Sunil P Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interocular velocity cues elicit vergence eye movements in mice.

Authors:  Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Crossed-uncrossed projections from primate retina are adapted to disparities of natural scenes.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Noah C Benson; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Development of Receptive Field Tuning Properties in Mouse Binocular Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Liming Tan; Dario L Ringach; Joshua T Trachtenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Disparity Sensitivity and Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex Areas.

Authors:  Alessandro La Chioma; Tobias Bonhoeffer; Mark Hübener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cell-type-specific binocular vision guides predation in mice.

Authors:  Keith P Johnson; Michael J Fitzpatrick; Lei Zhao; Bing Wang; Sean McCracken; Philip R Williams; Daniel Kerschensteiner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Natural binocular depth discrimination behavior in mice explained by visual cortical activity.

Authors:  Howard C Boone; Jason M Samonds; Emily C Crouse; Carrie Barr; Nicholas J Priebe; Aaron W McGee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 10.900

Review 8.  Evolution of neural processing for visual perception in vertebrates.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Spatial modulation of dark versus bright stimulus responses in the mouse visual system.

Authors:  Brice Williams; Joseph Del Rosario; Tomaso Muzzu; Kayla Peelman; Stefano Coletta; Edyta K Bichler; Anderson Speed; Lisa Meyer-Baese; Aman B Saleem; Bilal Haider
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 10.900

10.  Long term visuo-vestibular mismatch in freely behaving mice differentially affects gaze stabilizing reflexes.

Authors:  Filipa França de Barros; Louise Schenberg; Michele Tagliabue; Mathieu Beraneck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.