Literature DB >> 24013865

Depth and luminance edges attract.

Alan E Robinson1, Donald I A MacLeod.   

Abstract

The spatial resolution of disparity perception is poor compared to luminance perception, yet we do not notice that depth edges are more blurry than luminance edges. Is this because the two cues are combined by the visual system? Subjects judged the locations of depth-defined or luminance-defined edges, which were separated by up to 5.6 min of arc. The perceived edge location was a function of the depth-defined edge and the luminance-defined edge, with the luminance edge tending to play a larger role. Our data are compatible with but not completely explained by an optimal cue-combination model that gives more reliable cues a heavier weight. Both edge cues (depth and luminance) contribute to the final percept, with an adaptive weighting depending on the task and the acuity with which each cue is perceived.

Keywords:  cue combination; edge detection; sensor fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013865      PMCID: PMC3770340          DOI: 10.1167/13.11.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  R von der Heydt; H Zhou; H S Friedman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges.

Authors:  M S Landy; H Kojima
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Peak localization of sparsely sampled luminance patterns is based on interpolated 3D surface representation.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Localizing contours defined by more than one attribute.

Authors:  J Rivest; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Positional acuity without monocular cues.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; H A Mallot
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Depth perception in disparity gratings.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Foveal tritanopia.

Authors:  D R Williams; D I MacLeod; M M Hayhoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Apparent sharpness of 3D video when one eye's view is more blurry.

Authors:  Alan Robinson; Ankit Jain; Mathew Scott; Don Macleod; Truong Nguyen
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.