Literature DB >> 24452383

Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.

Markus Janczyk1, Marian E Berryhill.   

Abstract

The retro-cue effect (RCE) describes superior working memory performance for validly cued stimulus locations long after encoding has ended. Importantly, this happens with delays beyond the range of iconic memory. In general, the RCE is a stable phenomenon that emerges under varied stimulus configurations and timing parameters. We investigated its susceptibility to dual-task interference to determine the attentional requirements at the time point of cue onset and encoding. In Experiment 1, we compared single- with dual-task conditions. In Experiment 2, we borrowed from the psychological refractory period paradigm and compared conditions with high and low (dual-) task overlap. The secondary task was always binary tone discrimination requiring a manual response. Across both experiments, an RCE was found, but it was diminished in magnitude in the critical dual-task conditions. A previous study did not find evidence that sustained attention is required in the interval between cue offset and test. Our results apparently contradict these findings and point to a critical time period around cue onset and briefly thereafter during which attention is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452383      PMCID: PMC4080723          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0615-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; M D Schulkind
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect?

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

5.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Tal Makovsik; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.

Authors:  Collin Green; James C Johnston; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.

Authors:  Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Differential frontal involvement in shifts of internal and perceptual attention.

Authors:  Ryan T Tanoue; Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Orienting attention to locations in mental representations.

Authors:  Duncan Edward Astle; Jennifer Summerfield; Ivan Griffin; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Eren Gunseli; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Chaoxiong Ye; Zhonghua Hu; Tapani Ristaniemi; Maria Gendron; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues.

Authors:  Marcel Gressmann; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?

Authors:  Amy L Atkinson; Ed D J Berry; Amanda H Waterman; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.691

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.