Literature DB >> 28447102

Multimodal breast cancer imaging using coregistered dynamic diffuse optical tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Bernhard B Zimmermann1, Bin Deng2, Bhawana Singh2, Mark Martino3, Juliette Selb2, Qianqian Fang4, Amir Y Sajjadi2, Jayne Cormier5, Richard H Moore5, Daniel B Kopans6, David A Boas2, Mansi A Saksena6, Stefan A Carp2.   

Abstract

Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) is emerging as a noninvasive functional imaging method for breast cancer diagnosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring. In particular, the multimodal approach of combining DOT with x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is especially synergistic as DBT prior information can be used to enhance the DOT reconstruction. DOT, in turn, provides a functional information overlay onto the mammographic images, increasing sensitivity and specificity to cancer pathology. We describe a dynamic DOT apparatus designed for tight integration with commercial DBT scanners and providing a fast (up to 1 Hz) image acquisition rate to enable tracking hemodynamic changes induced by the mammographic breast compression. The system integrates 96 continuous-wave and 24 frequency-domain source locations as well as 32 continuous wave and 20 frequency-domain detection locations into low-profile plastic plates that can easily mate to the DBT compression paddle and x-ray detector cover, respectively. We demonstrate system performance using static and dynamic tissue-like phantoms as well as in vivo images acquired from the pool of patients recalled for breast biopsies at the Massachusetts General Hospital Breast Imaging Division.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447102      PMCID: PMC5406652          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.046008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  64 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Frequency domain near-infrared multiwavelength imager design using high-speed, direct analog-to-digital conversion.

Authors:  Bernhard B Zimmermann; Qianqian Fang; David A Boas; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Combining near-infrared tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to study in vivo breast tissue: implementation of a Laplacian-type regularization to incorporate magnetic resonance structure.

Authors:  Ben Brooksby; Shudong Jiang; Hamid Dehghani; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; John Weaver; Christine Kogel; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Design and implementation of dynamic near-infrared optical tomographic imaging instrumentation for simultaneous dual-breast measurements.

Authors:  Christoph H Schmitz; David P Klemer; Rosemarie Hardin; Michael S Katz; Yaling Pei; Harry L Graber; Mikhail B Levin; Rita D Levina; Nelson A Franco; William B Solomon; Randall L Barbour
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-04-10       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Diffuse Optics for Tissue Monitoring and Tomography.

Authors:  T Durduran; R Choe; W B Baker; A G Yodh
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2010-07

6.  Digital optical tomography system for dynamic breast imaging.

Authors:  Molly L Flexman; Michael A Khalil; Rabah Al Abdi; Hyun K Kim; Christopher J Fong; Elise Desperito; Dawn L Hershman; Randall L Barbour; Andreas H Hielscher
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Characterization of structural-prior guided optical tomography using realistic breast models derived from dual-energy x-ray mammography.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Dana H Brooks; David A Boas; Mats Lundqvist; Qianqian Fang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Diagnostic performance of dedicated positron emission mammography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in women with suspicious breast lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carmelo Caldarella; Giorgio Treglia; Alessandro Giordano
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Enhanced resting-state dynamics of the hemoglobin signal as a novel biomarker for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Harry L Graber; Rabah Al abdi; Yong Xu; Armand P Asarian; Peter J Pappas; Lisa Dresner; Naresh Patel; Kuppuswamy Jagarlamundi; William B Solomon; Randall L Barbour
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  A review of optical breast imaging: Multi-modality systems for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Steven Poplack
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Impact of errors in experimental parameters on reconstructed breast images using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Mats Lundqvist; Qianqian Fang; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Prospective assessment of adjunctive ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography in women undergoing breast biopsy: Impact on BI-RADS assessments.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Catherine A Young; Ian S Hagemann; Jingqin Luo; Cheryl R Herman; Kimberly Wiele; Shuying Li; Yifeng Zeng; Matthew F Covington; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.531

5.  Compact ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Hamed Vavadi; Atahar Mostafa; Feifei Zhou; K M Shihab Uddin; Murad Althobaiti; Chen Xu; Rajeev Bansal; Foluso Ademuyiwa; Steven Poplack; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  A Data Self-Calibration Method Based on High-Density Parallel Plate Diffuse Optical Tomography for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Rui Hu; Yirong Wang; Qiang Yan; Yihan Wang; Fei Kang; Shouping Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Deep learning-based method to accurately estimate breast tissue optical properties in the presence of the chest wall.

Authors:  Menghao Zhang; Shuying Li; Yun Zou; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.758

8.  Hybrid time-domain and continuous-wave diffuse optical tomography instrument with concurrent, clinical magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Cochran; David R Busch; Li Lin; David L Minkoff; Martin Schweiger; Simon Arridge; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Eun Young Chae; Hak Hee Kim; Sohail Sabir; Yejin Kim; Hyeongseok Kim; Sungho Yoon; Jong Chul Ye; Seungryong Cho; Duchang Heo; Kee Hyun Kim; Young Min Bae; Young-Wook Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.