Literature DB >> 24445732

Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management.

K Ganda1, A Schaffer, S Pearson, M J Seibel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Following initiation of oral bisphosphonate therapy through a secondary fracture prevention program, 2-year treatment compliance and persistence remained high and were similar in patients randomised to follow-up by either the program or primary care physician. Thus, community-based and specialist management are equally effective in supporting compliance and persistence with anti-osteoporotic treatments.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether management by a secondary fracture prevention (SFP) program (aka "fracture liaison service") results in better compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy than follow-up by the primary care physician, after initiation within an SFP program.
METHODS: This prospective RCT included 102 patients with incident osteoporotic fractures referred to a SFP program in Sydney, Australia. Following oral bisphosphonate therapy initiation, patients were randomised to either 6-monthly follow-up with the SFP program (group A) or referral to their primary care physician with a single SFP program visit at 24 months (group B). Compliance and persistence to treatment were measured using pharmaceutical claims data. Predictors of compliance and persistence and associations between compliance and persistence, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) or bone resorption marker, urinary deoxypyridinoline over 24 months were analysed.
RESULTS: The median medication possession ratio at 24 months was 0.78 (IQR, 0.50-0.93) in group A and 0.79 (IQR, 0.48-0.96) in group B (p = 0.68). Persistence at 24 months was also similar in both groups (64 vs. 61%, respectively; p = 0.75). After adjusting for confounders, patients in group A were not more likely to be compliant (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.46-2.47) or persistent (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.27-1.67) than those randomised to group B. Time-based changes in BMD or bone turnover were not associated with compliance or persistence.
CONCLUSION: Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy remain high amongst patients initiated within an SFP program, with community-based and SFP program management being equally effective in maintaining therapeutic compliance and persistence over 2 years. These results indicate that one of the main functions of an SFP program may be the initiation of therapy rather than continuous patient monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445732     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2610-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  40 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study.

Authors:  M S Cooper; A J Palmer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response with risedronate therapy: relationship with fracture risk and patient adherence.

Authors:  Richard Eastell; Bernard Vrijens; David L Cahall; Johann D Ringe; Patrick Garnero; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study.

Authors:  A Lih; H Nandapalan; M Kim; C Yap; P Lee; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996-2008: the situation is not improving.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Giangregorio; M Yogendran; M Azimaee; S Morin; C Metge; P Caetano; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Management of osteoporosis in fracture liaison service associated with long-term adherence to treatment.

Authors:  L Boudou; B Gerbay; F Chopin; E Ollagnier; P Collet; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study.

Authors:  D A Eekman; S H van Helden; A M Huisman; H J J Verhaar; I E M Bultink; P P Geusens; P Lips; W F Lems
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Repeat low-trauma fractures occur frequently among men and women who have osteopenic BMD.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; David Goltzman; Christopher S Kovacs; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; Nancy Kreiger; Robert Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou; Wojciech P Olszynski; Sophie A Jamal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Osteoporotic fracture: missed opportunity for intervention.

Authors:  Leah Port; Jacqueline Center; N Kathy Briffa; Tuan Nguyen; Robert Cumming; John Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  19 in total

1.  Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Adherence to osteoporosis therapy after an upper extremity fracture: a pre-specified substudy of the C-STOP randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F A McAlister; C Ye; L A Beaupre; B H Rowe; J A Johnson; D Bellerose; I Hassan; S R Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg.

Authors:  B Mugnier; A Daumas; S Doddoli; S Belmeliani; A-L Couderc; B Mizzi; P Lévêque; P Villani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Predictors of re-fracture amongst patients managed within a secondary fracture prevention program: a 7-year prospective study.

Authors:  K Ganda; A Schaffer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A novel effervescent formulation of oral weekly alendronate (70 mg) improves persistence compared to alendronate tablets in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Andrea Giusti; Gerolamo Bianchi; Antonella Barone; Dennis M Black
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review.

Authors:  C-H Wu; C-H Chen; P-H Chen; J-J Yang; P-C Chang; T-C Huang; S Bagga; Y Sharma; R-M Lin; D-C Chan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Improving drug adherence in osteoporosis: an update on more recent studies.

Authors:  Ayesha Jaleel; Kenneth G Saag; Maria I Danila
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  Patients' reasons for adhering to long-term alendronate therapy.

Authors:  J Pepe; C Cipriani; V Cecchetti; C Ferrara; G Della Grotta; V Danese; L Colangelo; S Minisola
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.

Authors:  N C W Harvey; E V McCloskey; P J Mitchell; B Dawson-Hughes; D D Pierroz; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.