Literature DB >> 12904835

Osteoporotic fracture: missed opportunity for intervention.

Leah Port1, Jacqueline Center, N Kathy Briffa, Tuan Nguyen, Robert Cumming, John Eisman.   

Abstract

As prior fracture is consistently associated with increased risk of subsequent fracture, subjects with a history of prior fracture represent a high risk group which should be targeted for intervention to reduce future fracture rates. The aim of this study was to investigate whether prior osteoporotic fracture affected treatment patterns among subjects admitted with hip fractures. All hip fracture admissions to two major teaching hospitals of the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, over the 12-month period between July 1997 and June 1998 were identified retrospectively from medical records. Patient demographics, frequency and location of prior fractures, and treatment status on admission were recorded. There were a total of 348 atraumatic hip fracture admissions over this 12-month period. Forty five percent of 251 women and 30% of 97 men with an osteoporotic hip fracture had a known prior fracture, including prior hip fracture in 19% of the women and 8% of the men. Among subjects with prior fractures, only 18% of women and 7% of men were on any specific anti-osteoporosis therapy. Even among those with a prior hip fracture, only 21% of women and none of the men were taking optimal appropriate therapy. A high proportion of individuals suffering hip fractures had sustained prior "signal" fractures. Although more subjects with prior fracture received treatment than those without prior fracture, total treatment levels were low, and the majority of high-risk subjects did not receive therapy shown to reduce the risk of further fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904835     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1452-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

1.  Effect and offset of effect of treatments for hip fracture on health outcomes.

Authors:  B Jonsson; J Kanis; A Dawson; A Oden; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Clinical use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Direct clinical and welfare costs of osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women.

Authors:  A Randell; P N Sambrook; T V Nguyen; H Lapsley; G Jones; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures.

Authors:  S M Rubin; S R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Health burden of hip and other fractures in Australia beyond 2000. Projections based on the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; G C Nicholson; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; E Seeman; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group.

Authors:  U A Liberman; S R Weiss; J Bröll; H W Minne; H Quan; N H Bell; J Rodriguez-Portales; R W Downs; J Dequeker; M Favus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prescribing by general practitioners after an osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; P Dolan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES).

Authors:  G Jones; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; C Gilbert; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Risk of new clinical fractures within 2 years following a fracture.

Authors:  Svenhjalmar van Helden; Jochen Cals; Fons Kessels; Peter Brink; Geert Jan Dinant; Piet Geusens
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Ramona Foster; Karim M Khan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Improving the osteoporosis care gap in elderly patients following hip fractures: For the ICHIBAN initiative.

Authors:  Jenson C S Mak; Charles Lai; Triet Bui; Fintan O'Rourke; Qing Shen; Ian D Cameron; Daniel K Y Chan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-09-14

5.  Barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care.

Authors:  A S Mendis; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures.

Authors:  D Bliuc; J A Eisman; J R Center
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Factors affecting willingness to get assessed and treated for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Y H Roh; E S Lee; J Ahn; H S Kim; H S Gong; K H Baek; H Y Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management.

Authors:  K Ganda; A Schaffer; S Pearson; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old? A nationwide study of over 700,000 older people.

Authors:  Kristina Johnell; Johan Fastbom
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Community-based randomised controlled trial evaluating falls and osteoporosis risk management strategies.

Authors:  P M Ciaschini; S E Straus; L R Dolovich; R A Goeree; K M Leung; C R Woods; G M Zimmerman; S R Majumdar; S Spadafora; L A Fera; H N Lee
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.