Literature DB >> 29525971

Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review.

C-H Wu1,2, C-H Chen3,4,5,6, P-H Chen7, J-J Yang8, P-C Chang9, T-C Huang10, S Bagga11, Y Sharma11, R-M Lin12, D-C Chan13,14,15.   

Abstract

Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been demonstrated to improve outcomes following osteoporotic fracture. The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to determine the characteristics of an FLS that lead to improved patient outcomes. We conducted a SLR, including articles published between 2000 and February 2017, using global (Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) and local databases. Studies including patients aged ≥ 50 years with osteoporotic fractures enrolled in an FLS were assessed. Information extracted from each article included key person coordinating the FLS (physician, nurse or other healthcare professional), setting (hospital vs community), intensity (single vs multiple), duration (long vs short term), fracture type and gender. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted based on the key person coordinating the FLS. Out of 7236 articles, 57 were considered to be high quality and identified for further analysis. The SLR identified several components which contributed to FLS success, including multidisciplinary involvement, driven by a dedicated case manager, regular assessment and follow-up, multifaceted interventions and patient education. Meta-analytic data confirm the effectiveness of an FLS following an osteoporotic fracture: approximate 27% increase in the likelihood of BMD testing and up to 21% increase in the likelihood of treatment initiation compared with usual care. The balance of evidence indicates that the multifaceted FLS and dedicated coordination are important success factors that contribute to effective FLS interventions which reduce fracture-related morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture liaison service; Intervention; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29525971     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4370-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  68 in total

1.  Quality-improvement interventions for osteoporosis: when are the results worth the effort?

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment intervention after hip or shoulder fracture. A comparison of two centres in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A W Murray; C McQuillan; B Kennon; S J Gallacher
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. Is automatic consultation needed?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Streeten; Asif Mohamed; Amish Gandhi; Denise Orwig; Paul Sack; Robert Sterling; Vincent D Pellegrini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study.

Authors:  A Lih; H Nandapalan; M Kim; C Yap; P Lee; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J M Queally; C Kiernan; M Shaikh; F Rowan; D Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A fracture prevention service reduces further fractures two years after incident minimal trauma fracture.

Authors:  John Van der Kallen; Michelle Giles; Kerry Cooper; Kerry Gill; Vicki Parker; Agness Tembo; Gabor Major; Linda Ross; Jan Carter
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.454

8.  An evaluation of an enhanced fracture liaison service as the optimal model for secondary prevention of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ir Wallace; F Callachand; J Elliott; Pv Gardiner
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-02-10

9.  Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service.

Authors:  K F Axelsson; R Jacobsson; D Lund; M Lorentzon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate.

Authors:  A Nakayama; G Major; E Holliday; J Attia; N Bogduk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  13 in total

1.  Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg.

Authors:  B Mugnier; A Daumas; S Doddoli; S Belmeliani; A-L Couderc; B Mizzi; P Lévêque; P Villani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Editorial: Secondary Fracture Prevention-What's Your System?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Melissa Steffen; Taisha Doo; Heather S Healy; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.879

5.  Development of the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework: clinical standards of care for the screening, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  M Chandran; P J Mitchell; T Amphansap; S K Bhadada; M Chadha; D-C Chan; Y-S Chung; P Ebeling; N Gilchrist; A Habib Khan; P Halbout; F L Hew; H-P T Lan; T C Lau; J K Lee; S Lekamwasam; G Lyubomirsky; L B Mercado-Asis; A Mithal; T V Nguyen; D Pandey; I R Reid; A Suzuki; T T Chit; K L Tiu; T Valleenukul; C K Yung; Y L Zhao
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bridging the gaps in secondary fracture prevention at a single center in Pakistan-compliance with the IOF best practice framework.

Authors:  Sibtain Ahmed; Nawazish Zehra; Shahryar Noordin; Anum Sadruddin; Aysha Habib Khan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Editorial: Secondary Fracture Prevention-What's Your System?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  The Evaluation of an Osteoporosis Clinic in a Community Hospital Setting: a Retrospective Chart Review and Telephone Survey.

Authors:  Timothy S H Kwok; Natasha Gakhal; Thanu N Ruban
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2019-09-30

9.  Fragility Fracture Prevention-Implementing a Fracture Liaison Service in a High Volume Orthopedic Hospital.

Authors:  Federico Pennestrì; Sabrina Corbetta; Vittoria Favero; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network.

Authors:  M K Javaid; A Sami; W Lems; P Mitchell; T Thomas; A Singer; R Speerin; M Fujita; D D Pierroz; K Akesson; P Halbout; S Ferrari; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.