Literature DB >> 21107534

Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study.

A Lih1, H Nandapalan, M Kim, C Yap, P Lee, K Ganda, M J Seibel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In the present prospective controlled observational study, we investigated the effect of a coordinated intervention program on 4-year refracture rates in patients with recent osteoporotic fractures. Compared to standard care, targeted identification, and management significantly reduced the risk of refracture by more than 80%.
INTRODUCTION: The risk of refracture following an incident osteoporotic fracture is high. Despite the availability of treatments that reduce refracture and mortality rates, most patients with minimal trauma fracture (MTF) are not managed appropriately. The present prospective controlled observational study investigated the effect of a coordinated intervention program on 4-year refracture rates and time to refracture in patients with recent osteoporotic fractures.
METHODS: Patients presenting with a non-vertebral MTF were actively identified and offered referral to a dedicated intervention program. Patients attending the clinic underwent a standardized set of investigations, were treated as indicated and reviewed at 12-monthly intervals ('MTF group'). Patients who elected to follow-up with their primary care physician were assigned to the concurrent control group.
RESULTS: Groups were balanced for baseline anthropometric, socio-economic, and clinical risk factors. Over 4 years, 10 out of 246 patients (4.1%) in the MTF group and 31 of 157 patients (19.7%) in the control group suffered a new fracture, with a median time to refracture of 26 and 16 months, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to the intervention group, the risk of refracture was increased by 5.3-fold in the control group (95% CI: 2.8-12.2, p < 0.01), and remained elevated (HR 5.63, 95%CI 2.73-11.6, p < 0.01) after adjustment for other significant predictors of refracture such as age and body weight.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with a minimal trauma non-vertebral fracture, active identification and management significantly reduces the risk of refracture (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12606000108516).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21107534     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1477-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  51 in total

1.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment intervention after hip or shoulder fracture. A comparison of two centres in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A W Murray; C McQuillan; B Kennon; S J Gallacher
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  First Fracture Project: addressing the osteoporosis care gap.

Authors:  J Vaile; L Sullivan; C Bennett; J Bleasel
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.048

4.  The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; C C Kennedy; G Ioannidis; Y Gao; A M Sawka; D Goltzman; A Tenenhouse; L Pickard; W P Olszynski; K S Davison; S Kaiser; R G Josse; N Kreiger; D A Hanley; J C Prior; J P Brown; T Anastassiades; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Eric Orwoll; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Martha C Swain
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study.

Authors:  D M Kado; T Duong; K L Stone; K E Ensrud; M C Nevitt; G A Greendale; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks.

Authors:  N D Nguyen; S A Frost; J R Center; J A Eisman; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  10-year probability of recurrent fractures following wrist and other osteoporotic fractures in a large clinical cohort: an analysis from the Manitoba Bone Density Program.

Authors:  Anthony B Hodsman; William D Leslie; James F Tsang; Greg D Gamble
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-10

9.  Improving care of patients at-risk for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Jennifer M Polinski; Margaret Stedman; Colleen Truppo; Laura Breiner; Catherine Egan; Saira Jan; Minal Patel; Thomas W Weiss; Ya-ting Chen; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jonathan D Adachi; George Ioannidis; Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley; Rolf J Sebaldt; Annie Petrie; Alan Tenenhouse; Gregory F Stephenson; Alexandra Papaioannou; Gordon H Guyatt; Charlie H Goldsmith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  48 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study.

Authors:  M S Cooper; A J Palmer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Fracture Liaison Services in an open system: how was it done? what were the barriers and how were they overcome?

Authors:  Manju Chandran
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.

Authors:  C A Inderjeeth; W D Raymond; A M Briggs; E Geelhoed; D Oldham; D Mountain
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care.

Authors:  A S Mendis; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Five-year refracture rates of a province-wide fracture liaison service.

Authors:  R Sujic; D E Beaton; M Mamdani; S M Cadarette; J Luo; S Jaglal; J E M Sale; R Jain; E Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg.

Authors:  B Mugnier; A Daumas; S Doddoli; S Belmeliani; A-L Couderc; B Mizzi; P Lévêque; P Villani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Association of Self-Reported Frailty with Falls and Fractures among Patients New to Dialysis.

Authors:  Cynthia Delgado; Stephanie Shieh; Barbara Grimes; Glenn M Chertow; Lorien S Dalrymple; George A Kaysen; John Kornak; Kirsten L Johansen
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.754

9.  Incidence of second hip fracture and compliant use of bisphosphonate.

Authors:  Y-K Lee; Y-C Ha; B-H Yoon; K-H Koo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an "OPTIMAL" model of care from Singapore.

Authors:  M Chandran; M Z W Tan; M Cheen; S B Tan; M Leong; T C Lau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.