Literature DB >> 15798899

Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

E Kuhry1, H J Bonjer, E Haglind, W C J Hop, R Veldkamp, M A Cuesta, J Jeekel, L Påhlman, M Morino, A Lacy, S Delgado.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High hospital case volume has been associated with improved outcome after open operation for colorectal malignancies.
METHODS: To assess the impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colon cancer, we conducted an analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic colon resection within the COlon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial.
RESULTS: A total of 536 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon were included in the analysis. Median operating time was 240, 210 and 188 min in centers with low, medium, and high case volumes, respectively (p < 0.001). A significant difference in conversion rate was observed among low, medium, and high case volume hospitals (24% vs 24% vs 9%; p < 0.001). A higher number of lymph nodes were harvested at high case volume hospitals (p < 0.001). After operation, fewer complications (p = 0.006) and a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) were observed in patients treated at hospitals with high caseloads.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic operation for colon cancer at hospitals with high caseloads appears to be associated with improved short-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798899     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8920-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

Review 1.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

4.  Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload.

Authors:  A J Simons; R Ker; S Groshen; C Gee; G J Anthone; A E Ortega; P Vukasin; R K Ross; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study.

Authors:  F Kee; R H Wilson; C Harper; C C Patterson; K McCallion; R F Houston; R J Moorehead; J M Sloan; B J Rowlands
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-22

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy.

Authors:  C C Nduka; J R Monson; N Menzies-Gow; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Hospital volume and surgical outcomes for elderly patients with colorectal cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; John A Cowan; Gilbert R Upchurch; Lisa M Colletti
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Joel E Tepper; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna R Hollis; Deborah Schrag; John Z Ayanian; Michael J O'Connell; Jane C Weeks; Robert J Mayer; Christopher G Willett; John S MacDonald; Al B Benson; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  38 in total

1.  Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Shigeru Yamagishi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Jun Watanabe; Hirokazu Suwa; Takashi Oshima; Chikara Kunisaki; Shigeo Ohki; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].

Authors:  Carolin Kastner; Joachim Reibetanz; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; K Uehara; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Impact of a full-time preceptor on the institutional outcome of laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Alessio Pigazzi; Casandra Anderson; Pablo Mojica-Manosa; David Smith; Kathrina Hernandez; I Benjamin Paz; Joshua D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of the outcomes for laparoscopic gastrectomy performed by the same surgeon between a low-volume hospital and a high-volume center.

Authors:  Min Gyu Kim; Sung Joon Kwon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy for rectal cancer: the need for randomized trials.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

Review 8.  Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

Authors:  E Kuhry; W F Schwenk; R Gaupset; U Romild; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

9.  Temporal trends in liver transplant centre volume in the USA.

Authors:  Elisabeth T Tracy; Kyla M Bennett; Emeline M Aviki; Theodore N Pappas; Bradley H Collins; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Paul C Kuo; John E Scarborough
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study.

Authors:  Mark D Smith; Emma Patterson; Abdus S Wahed; Steven H Belle; Marc Bessler; Anita P Courcoulas; David Flum; Valerie Halpin; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Bruce Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.