Literature DB >> 17122626

Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.

Selwyn O Rogers1, Robert E Wolf, Alan M Zaslavsky, William E Wright, John Z Ayanian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Greater hospital volume has been associated with lower mortality after colorectal cancer surgery. The contribution of surgeon volume to processes and outcomes of care is less well understood. We assessed the relation of surgeon and hospital volume to postoperative and overall mortality, colostomy rates, and use of adjuvant radiation therapy.
METHODS: From the California Cancer Registry, we studied 28,644 patients who underwent surgical resection of stage I to III colorectal cancer during 1996 to 1999 and were followed up to 6 years after surgery to assess 30-day postoperative mortality, overall long-term mortality, permanent colostomy, and use of adjuvant radiation therapy.
RESULTS: Across decreasing quartiles of hospital and surgeon volume, 30-day postoperative mortality ranged from 2.7% to 4.2% (P < 0.001). Adjusting for age, stage, comorbidity, and median income among patients with colorectal cancer who survived at least 30 days, patients in the lowest quartile of surgeon volume had a higher adjusted overall mortality rate than those in the highest quartile (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.24), as did patients in the lowest quartile of hospital volume relative to those treated in the highest quartile (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.19). For rectal cancer, adjusted colostomy rates were significantly higher for low-volume surgeons, and the use of adjuvant radiation therapy was significantly lower for low-volume hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater surgeon and hospital volumes were associated with improved outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Further study of processes that led to these differences may improve the quality of colorectal cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122626      PMCID: PMC1856632          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231759.10432.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  39 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Lowering cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  L A Fleisher; K A Eagle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Will volume-based referral strategies reduce costs or just save lives?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Jonathan S Skinner; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Mark Radzyner; David Rubin; James Dougherty; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims.

Authors:  J X Zhang; T J Iwashyna; N A Christakis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Marusch; A Koch; U Schmidt; M Pross; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  D Schrag; L D Cramer; P B Bach; A M Cohen; J L Warren; C B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; N Baxter; A Balshem; E Ross; Z Cohen; R McLeod; P Engstrom; E Sigurdson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D C Hodgson; C S Fuchs; J Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Are high-volume surgeons and hospitals the most important predictors of in-hospital outcome for colon cancer resection?

Authors:  Clifford Y Ko; John T Chang; Saima Chaudhry; Gerald Kominski
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  37 in total

1.  Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; David P Winchester; Thomas R Russell; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Christopher W Macomber; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; W Brian Sweeney; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Heena P Santry; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Elective resection of colon cancer by high-volume surgeons is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Sebastien Drolet; Anthony R MacLean; Robert P Myers; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ya Ruth Huo; Kevin Phan; David L Morris; Winston Liauw
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics.

Authors:  Karl-Heinrich Link; Peter Coy; Mark Roitman; Carola Link; Marko Kornmann; Ludger Staib
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-20

6.  Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincent J Obias; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

7.  Comparison of comorbidity collection methods.

Authors:  Dorina Kallogjeri; Sheila M Gaynor; Marilyn L Piccirillo; Raymond A Jean; Edward L Spitznagel; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Jeong-Heum Baek; Abdulhadi Alrubaie; Eduardo A Guzman; Sun Keun Choi; Casandra Anderson; Steven Mills; Joseph Carmichael; Andy Dagis; Dajun Qian; Joseph Kim; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Michael J Stamos; Lisa Bening; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Factors associated with ordering laboratory monitoring of high-risk medications.

Authors:  Shira H Fischer; Jennifer Tjia; George Reed; Daniel Peterson; Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.