Literature DB >> 24436320

Laterality Differences in Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity.

John E Schlerf1, Joseph M Galea2, Danny Spampinato3, Pablo A Celnik4.   

Abstract

Lateralization of function is an important organizational feature of the motor system. Each effector is predominantly controlled by the contralateral cerebral cortex and the ipsilateral cerebellum. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have revealed hemispheric differences in the stimulation strength required to evoke a muscle response from the primary motor cortex (M1), with the dominant hemisphere typically requiring less stimulation than the nondominant. The current study assessed whether the strength of the connection between the cerebellum and M1 (CB-M1), known to change in association with motor learning, have hemispheric differences and whether these differences have any behavioral correlate. We observed, in right-handed individuals, that the connection between the right cerebellum and left M1 is typically stronger than the contralateral network. Behaviorally, we detected no lateralized learning processes, though we did find a significant effect on the amplitude of reaching movements across hands. Furthermore, we observed that the strength of the CB-M1 connection is correlated with the amplitude variability of reaching movements, a measure of movement precision, where stronger connectivity was associated with better precision. These findings indicate that lateralization in the motor system is present beyond the primary motor cortex, and points to an association between cerebellar M1 connectivity and movement execution.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellum; motor control; reaching; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24436320      PMCID: PMC4459286          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  38 in total

1.  Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum.

Authors:  A D Pinto; R Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activity during unimanual hand movements relates to task complexity.

Authors:  Timothy Verstynen; Jörn Diedrichsen; Neil Albert; Paul Aparicio; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebellar learning in the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Byron Tang; Rani Pallegadda; Erin V L Vasudevan; Pablo Celnik; Amy Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Amy J Bastian; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Individuals with cerebellar degeneration show similar adaptation deficits with large and small visuomotor errors.

Authors:  John E Schlerf; Jing Xu; Nola M Klemfuss; Thomas L Griffiths; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli.

Authors:  Karen M Fisher; H Ming Lai; Mark R Baker; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  21 in total

1.  The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Lateralization of brain activity pattern during unilateral movement in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Yanan Hou; Mark Hallett; Jiarong Zhang; Piu Chan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cerebellar contributions to biological motion perception in autism and typical development.

Authors:  Allison Jack; Cara M Keifer; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Hannah J Block; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks?

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Pablo A Celnik; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; Riccardo Di Iorio; Paolo Maria Rossini; Jung E Park; Robert Chen; Pablo Celnik; Antonio P Strafella; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Reduced Cerebellar Brain Inhibition Measured Using Dual-Site TMS in Older Than in Younger Adults.

Authors:  B K Rurak; J P Rodrigues; B D Power; P D Drummond; A M Vallence
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements.

Authors:  Matthew Weightman; John-Stuart Brittain; R Chris Miall; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases.

Authors:  Danny Spampinato; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 7.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.