Literature DB >> 24432060

A brief overview of 100 years of history of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Carol C Hasler1.   

Abstract

The history of surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis reaches back about 100 years: the natural course of progressive, crippling and sometimes even life-threatening deformities which could not be controlled by external means called for effectual, invasive procedures. Hibbs 1911 aimed at halting progression by long, uninstrumented fusions. However, the lack of true correction, long rehabilitation times, high pseudarthrosis and infection rates, and a fusion mass which bent further once exposed to gravity again were not satisfying. The transition from slowing progression to halting progression and truly correcting the deformity lasted almost another half a century: Paul Harrington, confronted with many scoliotic polio patients, successfully introduced a hook-rod system for concave-distraction and convex-compression at the end of the 1950s. Many implant failures, a still-considerable pseudarthrosis rate, flattening of the sagittal profile and the lack of true three-dimensional (3D) correction were the shortcomings. In the 1970s the Frenchmen Cotrel and Dubousset took scoliosis surgery to the next level by introducing a versatile hook system and curve-pattern-adapted correction modes. The basics of the so-called derotation-manoeuvre consists in strategic distribution of the anchors along the curve, bending the rod accordingly, and rotating it back into the sagittal plane. The overall correction, stability and the fusion rates improved significantly. However, the effect on the sagittal and transverse plane were still limited. Lately, a better biomechanical understanding and bilateral, polysegmental strong three-column fixation with pedicle screw has become the benchmark method: in conjunction with posterior release techniques, osteotomies or even vertebral column resections for severe cases, it allows better 3D control (vertebral column manipulation), faster rehabilitation and better patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; History; Idiopathic scoliosis; Surgery

Year:  2012        PMID: 24432060      PMCID: PMC3566253          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0466-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  58 in total

1.  Posterior vertebral column resection in severe spinal deformities: a total of 102 cases.

Authors:  Azmi Hamzaoglu; Ahmet Alanay; Cagatay Ozturk; Mercan Sarier; Selhan Karadereler; Kursat Ganiyusufoglu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.228

3.  Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of Lenke type-1 curve exhibit specific pedicle width pattern.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Jin-Hyok Kim; Sung-Soo Kim; Dong-Ju Lim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Loyola V Gressot; Kyle Hubler; Michelle C Marks; Tracey P Bastrom; Randal R Betz; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Changes in life satisfaction and self-esteem in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without surgical intervention.

Authors:  Jingtao Zhang; Dawei He; Juan Gao; Xiuchun Yu; Haining Sun; Ziqiang Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Justin S Smith; Charles A Sansur; Steven D Glassman; Christopher P Ames; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Joseph H Perra; Dennis Raymond Knapp; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Richard E McCarthy; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine.

Authors:  Michiel M A Janssen; Jan-Willem M Kouwenhoven; Tom P C Schlösser; Max A Viergever; Lambertus W Bartels; René M Castelein; Koen L Vincken
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Efficacy and safety of posteromedial translation for correction of thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a new connection to the spine: the Universal Clamp.

Authors:  Keyvan Mazda; Brice Ilharreborde; Julien Even; Yan Lefevre; Franck Fitoussi; Georges-François Penneçot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system.

Authors:  Jahangir Asghar; Amer F Samdani; Joshua M Pahys; Linda P D'andrea; James T Guille; David H Clements; Randal R Betz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  3D rod shape changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation: how much does it impact correction?

Authors:  Franck Le Navéaux; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Peter O Newton; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  History of Spinal Fusion: Where We Came from and Where We Are Going.

Authors:  Sohrab Virk; Sheeraz Qureshi; Harvinder Sandhu
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-25

Review 3.  [Fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : Anterior, posterior or combined? One-stage or two-stage?].

Authors:  V Quack; B Rath; H Schenker; A Schulze; Y El Mansy; M Tingart; M Betsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Finite element study of the impact of pedicle screw density on the biomechanical response of a Lenke 1AN scoliotic curve.

Authors:  Justin M Warren; Lloyd A Hey; Andre P Mazzoleni
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-18

5.  Complications following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 10-year prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Arun R Hariharan; Suken A Shah; Joseph Petfield; Margaret Baldwin; Burt Yaszay; Peter O Newton; Lawrence G Lenke; Baron S Lonner; Firoz Miyanji; Paul D Sponseller; Amer F Samdani
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-04-30

6.  Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery-A Comprehensive Analysis of Treatment-Specific Variables and Trends in Latvia.

Authors:  Julian M Rüwald; Janis Upenieks; Janis Ositis; Alexander Pycha; Yuval Avidan; Anna L Rüwald; Robin L Eymael; Frank A Schildberg
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  LIPUS promotes spinal fusion coupling proliferation of type H microvessels in bone.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Yahong Yang; Xiaoyi Zhou; Yajun Cheng; Xianzhao Wei; Ming Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Is Convex Derotation Equally Effective as Concave Derotation for Achieving Adequate Correction of Selective Lenke's Type- 1 Scoliosis?

Authors:  Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal; Yu-Cheng Yeh; Chi-Chien Niu; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  A 43-Year Follow-Up of Unilateral Harrington Rod Instrumentation and Limited Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Jordan Vokes; Emmanuel Menga; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.