Literature DB >> 21874624

Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Steven W Hwang1, Amer F Samdani, Loyola V Gressot, Kyle Hubler, Michelle C Marks, Tracey P Bastrom, Randal R Betz, Patrick J Cahill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to clarify the effect of applying derotation maneuvers in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on the sagittal plane.
METHODS: We retrospectively queried a large, multicenter, prospectively collected database for patients who underwent surgical correction of AIS. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up and documentation as to whether or not a derotation maneuver was performed during surgery. All patients underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw constructs. Patients who underwent concurrent anterior procedures were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 323 patients were identified, of whom 66 did not have direct vertebral body derotation (DVBD) maneuvers applied during the deformity correction. The remaining 257 had a vertebral body derotation maneuver performed during their surgical correction. Although no significant differences were identified between the two groups when comparing pre-op and post-op thoracic kyphosis using T2-12 and T5-12 endplates, the absolute change in angulation measured from T2-12 was significantly different between the two groups. Postoperatively, the derotation group had a mean decrease in thoracic kyphosis of 5.1±15.3° as compared to 10.8±18.9° in the control group, P = 0.03.
CONCLUSION: Although patients in both groups had decreased mean thoracic kyphosis postoperatively, application of DVBD in the correction of scoliosis did not additionally worsen the sagittal profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21874624      PMCID: PMC3252432          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1991-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve.

Authors:  E W SOMERVILLE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1952-08

2.  Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.

Authors:  Jason E Lowenstein; Hiroko Matsumoto; Michael G Vitale; Mark Weidenbaum; Jaime A Gomez; Francis Young-In Lee; Joshua E Hyman; David P Roye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: uncoupled neuro-osseous growth?

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance).

Authors:  K C Booth; K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; C R Baldus; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation.

Authors:  Peter S Rose; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Daniel S Mulconrey; Geoffrey A Cronen; Jacob M Buchowski; Richard M Schwend; Brenda A Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Current concepts and management of patients with fixed decompensated spinal deformity.

Authors:  D S Bradford; C B Tribus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after posterior fusion in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  B Blondel; V Lafage; F Schwab; J P Farcy; G Bollini; J L Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pedicle screw instrumentation and spinal deformities: have we gone too far?

Authors:  John McCormick; Max Aebi; David Toby; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by simultaneous translation on two rods for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Clement; Edouard Chau; Anne Geoffray; Georges Suisse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The risks of aorta impingement from pedicle screw may increase due to aorta movement during posterior instrumentation in Lenke 5C curve: a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Leilei Xu; Yong Qiu; Jun Qiao; Fei Wang; Zhen Liu; Benglong Shi; Bang-ping Qian; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Michelle Marks; Tracy Bastrom; Hitesh Garg; Baron Lonner; James T Bennett; Joshua Pahys; Suken Shah; Firoz Miyanji; Harry Shufflebarger; Peter Newton; Randal Betz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Radiographic, clinical, and patients' assessment of segmental direct vertebral body derotation versus simple rod derotation in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective, comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Xiangyu Tang; Jing Zhao; Yonggang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  A brief overview of 100 years of history of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Guy Sebag; Wafa Skalli; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posteromedial translation.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Christophe Vidal; Wafa Skalli; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.