Franck Le Navéaux1,2, Carl-Eric Aubin3,4, Stefan Parent2, Peter O Newton5, Hubert Labelle2. 1. Polytechnique Montreal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O. Box 6079, Downtown Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3A7, Canada. 2. Research Center, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, 3175, Cote Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada. 3. Polytechnique Montreal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O. Box 6079, Downtown Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3A7, Canada. carl-eric.aubin@polymtl.ca. 4. Research Center, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, 3175, Cote Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada. carl-eric.aubin@polymtl.ca. 5. Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center, 3020 Children's Way, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Flattening of rods is known to reduce the correction capability of the instrumentation, but has not been studied in 3D. The aim is to evaluate the rods shape 3D changes during and immediately after instrumentation, and its effect on 3D correction. METHODS: The 5.5 mm CoCr rods of 35 right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were measured from rod tracings prior to insertion, and reconstructed in 3D from bi-planar radiographs taken intra-operatively after the correction maneuvers and 1 week post-operatively. The rod bending curvature, maximal deflection and orientation of the rod's plane of maximum curvature (RPMC) were computed at each stage. The relation between rod contour, kyphosis and apical vertebral rotation (AVR) was assessed. RESULTS: Main thoracic Cobb angle was corrected from 58° ± 10° to 15° ± 8°. Prior to insertion, rods were more bent on the concave side (curvature/deflection: 39° ± 8°/25 ± 6 mm) than the convex side (26° ± 5°/17 ± 3 mm). Only the concave rod shape changed after the correction maneuvers execution (flattening of 21° ± 9°/13 ± 7 mm; p < 0.001) and stayed unchanged post-operatively. After instrumentation, the RPMC was deviated from the sagittal plane (concave side: 27° ± 19°/convex side: 15° ± 12°). There was a significant association between kyphosis change and the relative concave rod to spine contour (rod curvature-pre-operative kyphosis) (R 2 = 0.58) and between AVR correction and initial differential concave/convex rods deflection (R 2 = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Correction maneuvers induce a significant change of the concave rod profile. Both rods end in a plane deviated from the sagittal plane which is representative of the spinal curvature 3D orientation. Differential rod contouring technique has a significant impact on the resulting thoracic kyphosis and transverse plane correction.
PURPOSE: Flattening of rods is known to reduce the correction capability of the instrumentation, but has not been studied in 3D. The aim is to evaluate the rods shape 3D changes during and immediately after instrumentation, and its effect on 3D correction. METHODS: The 5.5 mm CoCr rods of 35 right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosispatients were measured from rod tracings prior to insertion, and reconstructed in 3D from bi-planar radiographs taken intra-operatively after the correction maneuvers and 1 week post-operatively. The rod bending curvature, maximal deflection and orientation of the rod's plane of maximum curvature (RPMC) were computed at each stage. The relation between rod contour, kyphosis and apical vertebral rotation (AVR) was assessed. RESULTS: Main thoracic Cobb angle was corrected from 58° ± 10° to 15° ± 8°. Prior to insertion, rods were more bent on the concave side (curvature/deflection: 39° ± 8°/25 ± 6 mm) than the convex side (26° ± 5°/17 ± 3 mm). Only the concave rod shape changed after the correction maneuvers execution (flattening of 21° ± 9°/13 ± 7 mm; p < 0.001) and stayed unchanged post-operatively. After instrumentation, the RPMC was deviated from the sagittal plane (concave side: 27° ± 19°/convex side: 15° ± 12°). There was a significant association between kyphosis change and the relative concave rod to spine contour (rod curvature-pre-operative kyphosis) (R 2 = 0.58) and between AVR correction and initial differential concave/convex rods deflection (R 2 = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Correction maneuvers induce a significant change of the concave rod profile. Both rods end in a plane deviated from the sagittal plane which is representative of the spinal curvature 3D orientation. Differential rod contouring technique has a significant impact on the resulting thoracic kyphosis and transverse plane correction.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Differential rod contouring; Rod contour; Thoracic kyphosis; Vertebral rotation
Authors: Joseph H Carreau; Tracey Bastrom; Maty Petcharaporn; Caitlin Schulte; Michelle Marks; Tamás Illés; Szabolcs Somoskeöy; Peter O Newton Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2014-03-05
Authors: Raymond W Liu; Burt Yaszay; Diana Glaser; Tracey P Bastrom; Peter O Newton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Elamir Bachar Harfouch; Reem Fahd Bunyan; Mona Al Faraidy; Nayef Bin Dajim; Fahad A Al Mulhim; Haitham H Alnemari; Shahid Bashir Journal: World Neurosurg X Date: 2022-04-25
Authors: Jakub Sikora-Klak; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Brice Ilharreborde; Madeline Cross; Tracey P Bastrom; Keyvan Mazda; Burt Yaszay; Peter O Newton Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Peter Endre Eltes; Mate Turbucz; Jennifer Fayad; Ferenc Bereczki; György Szőke; Tamás Terebessy; Damien Lacroix; Peter Pal Varga; Aron Lazary Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-01-05